Topic: crossdressing implications

The bulk update request #11904 is pending approval.

create implication crossdressing_male (905) -> crossdressing (41785)
create implication crossdressing_female (89) -> crossdressing (41785)
create implication crossdressing_andromorph (17) -> crossdressing (41785)
create implication crossdressing_andromorph (17) -> crossdressing_intersex (0)
create implication crossdressing_gynomorph (0) -> crossdressing (41785)
create implication crossdressing_gynomorph (0) -> crossdressing_intersex (0)
create implication crossdressing_intersex (0) -> crossdressing (41785)

Reason: crossdressing_gynomorph and crossdressing_intersex are not currently in use, but it would be good practice for the future to implement implications in case they are in the future

previous discussion: topic #57357

synf3ll said:
The bulk update request #11904 is pending approval.

create implication crossdressing_male (905) -> crossdressing (41785)
create implication crossdressing_female (89) -> crossdressing (41785)
create implication crossdressing_andromorph (17) -> crossdressing (41785)
create implication crossdressing_andromorph (17) -> crossdressing_intersex (0)
create implication crossdressing_gynomorph (0) -> crossdressing (41785)
create implication crossdressing_gynomorph (0) -> crossdressing_intersex (0)
create implication crossdressing_intersex (0) -> crossdressing (41785)

Reason: crossdressing_gynomorph and crossdressing_intersex are not currently in use, but it would be good practice for the future to implement implications in case they are in the future

i question the usefulness of crossdressing_intersex in the same logic of why we dont have intersex_(lore) tags

jhudson said:
i question the usefulness of crossdressing_intersex in the same logic of why we dont have intersex_(lore) tags

intersex_(lore) ?

manitka said:
intersex_(lore) ?

sorry, forget what i said

manitka said:
intersex_(lore) ?

While this exists as a tag it is not the same as the non lore version
The general one is an umbrella tag and should not be used on its own, the lore tag is not an umbrella and is meant to be used on its own

donovan_dmc said:
While this exists as a tag it is not the same as the non lore version
The general one is an umbrella tag and should not be used on its own, the lore tag is not an umbrella and is meant to be used on its own

yes, thank you, you jogged my memory
i was thinking about how the lore tag doesn't have all of the implications