Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag alias #78831 aeromorph -> living_aircraft has been rejected.
Reason: Aeromorphs are living aircraft, be they more anthropomorphic (two-legged) or closer to real-life aircraft. I'm fairly certain these two used to be aliased, as well.
EDIT: The tag alias aeromorph -> living_aircraft (forum #462142) has been rejected by @spe.
Updated by auto moderator
It was recently unaliased.
topic #46539
Could do with an implication though.
Updated
The bulk update request #11901 has been rejected.
create implication aeromorph (3100) -> living_aircraft (4375)
Reason: The other living aircraft forms have been implied this way.
EDIT: The bulk update request #11901 (forum #462144) has been rejected by @regsmutt.
Updated by auto moderator
regsmutt said:
The bulk update request #11901 has been rejected.create implication aeromorph (3100) -> living_aircraft (4375)
Reason: The other living aircraft forms have been implied this way.
The bulk update request #11901 (forum #462144) has been rejected by @regsmutt.
Oh oopsie. I thought that normally the BUR gets mad and throws an error when you try to make a dupe.
regsmutt said:
Oh oopsie. I thought that normally the BUR gets mad and throws an error when you try to make a dupe.
I guess it's aliases that do that rather than implications. That's my guess, at least. :\
regsmutt said:
Oh oopsie. I thought that normally the BUR gets mad and throws an error when you try to make a dupe.
clawstripe said:
I guess it's aliases that do that rather than implications. That's my guess, at least. :\
They're both BURs, BURs do not create any aliases or implications until approved, so no error is being shown here because the implication does not yet actually exist
The tag alias aeromorph -> living_aircraft (forum #462142) has been rejected by @spe.
