Topic: Snout typing [BUR]

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #11780 is pending approval.

create implication big_snout (141) -> snout (83642)
create implication blocky_snout (197) -> snout (83642)
create implication multi_snout (45) -> snout (83642)
create implication rounded_snout (42) -> snout (83642)
create implication short_snout (1394) -> snout (83642) # duplicate of implication #65907
create implication small_snout (58) -> snout (83642)
create implication snout_overhang (59) -> snout (83642)
create implication tapering_snout (134) -> snout (83642)
create implication snout_fuck (1657) -> snout (83642)

Reason: various types of snouts..

watsit said:
I don't think snout_fuck should imply snout, just as penile_penetration doesn't imply penis.

post #5676342 (ignoring the dragon's snout)

to be clear I always felt that to be odd and that it goes against twys, you cant say something is penile unless there is a penis actually is visible. Penile is any sexual action by way of a penis. And no sex toys in the shape of a penis(dildos) are not penile. Even if we ignore twys there is no such ambiguity for a snout that can sometimes exist between whether something is a penis or sex toy.

In any case that example is mistaged as you cannot tell whether they are humanoid or an anthro with a snout.

Original page: https://e621.net/forum_topics/58448?page=1