Topic: BUR holes in impending->imminent coverage

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #11760 is pending approval.

create alias impending_anal (61) -> imminent_anal (5589)
create alias impending_oral (0) -> imminent_oral (3240)
create alias impending_vaginal (0) -> imminent_vaginal (557)

Reason: Several impending_* -> imminent_* aliases already exist, one exception being impending_doom, which is a well-established phrase in English (come to think of it, does anything else impend?).
There are currently 55 uses of impending_anal.
Granted, impending_oral has only been used a handful of times, all of which have already been manually changed over, and impending_vaginal has never been used. But I figure we might as well proactively fill all three holes at once.
There are a few other tags like impending_violence and impending_abuse, but even the imminent versions of these have much fewer uses, so I'm not sure whether it makes sense to alias them. Maybe just mass update.

The bulk update request #12684 is pending approval.

create alias impending_violence (35) -> imminent_violence (162)
create alias impending_torture (10) -> imminent_torture (98)
create alias impending_fellatio (8) -> imminent_fellatio (647)
create alias impending_transformation (41) -> imminent_transformation (708)

Reason: Some more.

There's also impending_abuse, which I'm not sure what to do with. abuse is defined by being an ongoing thing, so I feel like if it's "impending" or "imminent" that's just abuse.

Original page: https://e621.net/forum_topics/58390?page=1