Topic: Presenting Genitals BUR

The bulk update request #11476 is pending approval.

create alias presenting_genitalia (571) -> presenting_genitals (12)
create implication presenting_genitals (12) -> presenting (298081)
create implication presenting_genitals (12) -> genitals (2654207)
create implication presenting_penis (29825) -> presenting_genitals (12)
remove implication presenting_penis (29825) -> presenting (298081)
create implication presenting_balls (13107) -> presenting_genitals (12)
create implication presenting_vulva (72369) -> presenting_genitals (12)
create implication presenting_clitoris (23) -> presenting_genitals (12)
create implication presenting_cloaca (1764) -> presenting_genitals (12)
remove implication presenting_cloaca (1764) -> presenting (298081)
create implication presenting_sheath (402) -> presenting_genitals (12)
create implication presenting_genital_slit (72) -> presenting_genitals (12)

Reason: Populating the general tag for 'presenting genitals'.

May as well also have presenting_genitals imply presenting, and remove the implication to presenting from those individual tags.

watsit said:
May as well also have presenting_genitals imply presenting, and remove the implication to presenting from those individual tags.

That is true. Updated the script (currently only presenting_penis implies presenting)

Oh, another point that I didn't think about when I saw this BUR: presenting_cloaca should be covered under this.

The tag implies cloca, which implies animal_genitalia, which implies genitals, so it would be applicable to this BUR. You would have to unimply presenting and apply presenting_genitals for it.

Edit: You should also make presenting_genitals imply genitals. Yes, tagging the others will imply genitals, but only tagging presenting_genitals by itself will not.

Why genitals over genitalia? The latter seems to be preferred in tags
genitalia
genitals

This can also be seen in the post count disparity between the two existing tags, presenting genitalia has more than 50 times as many posts as presenting genitals despite neither having any implications

donovan_dmc said:
Why genitals over genitalia? The latter seems to be preferred in tags
genitalia
genitals

This can also be seen in the post count disparity between the two existing tags, presenting genitalia has more than 50 times as many posts as presenting genitals despite neither having any implications

The root tag is genitals, so I'm assuming that's done for consistency with it. It's currently a hodgepodge of usage and should be standardized, but that may be better split into a separate and larger overhaul project.

donovan_dmc said:
Why genitals over genitalia? The latter seems to be preferred in tags
genitalia
genitals

This can also be seen in the post count disparity between the two existing tags, presenting genitalia has more than 50 times as many posts as presenting genitals despite neither having any implications

Should've mentioned it in the BUR reason, but it's done to match the genitalia -> genitals alias. Although I do see that A LOT of tags still use the old term

song said:
Oh, another point that I didn't think about when I saw this BUR: presenting_cloaca should be covered under this.

The tag implies cloca, which implies animal_genitalia, which implies genitals, so it would be applicable to this BUR. You would have to unimply presenting and apply presenting_genitals for it.

Edit: You should also make presenting_genitals imply genitals. Yes, tagging the others will imply genitals, but only tagging presenting_genitals by itself will not.

Will do. Updated

I'm also thinking about adding presenting_sheath and presenting_slit/presenting_genital_slit, since both sheath and genital_slit also imply animal_genitalia

j4tapi said:
Should've mentioned it in the BUR reason, but it's done to match the genitalia -> genitals alias. Although I do see that A LOT of tags still use the old term

I'm also thinking about adding presenting_sheath and presenting_slit/presenting_genital_slit, since both sheath and genital_slit also imply animal_genitalia

I think presenting_genital_slit is the right term there since slit is already aliased to slit_(disambiguation). I would preemptively alias presenting_slit to the existing disambiguation, but maybe in a different topic to keep the scope here limited.

The terms presenting_sheath and presenting_genital_slit should be safe to imply to presenting_genitals.