Topic: [APPROVED] Sneaker colors

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

HardShirt

Member

The bulk update request #11176 is active.

create implication green_sneakers (72) -> green_shoes (964)
create implication yellow_sneakers (57) -> yellow_shoes (944)
create implication grey_sneakers (34) -> grey_shoes (821)
create implication tan_sneakers (3) -> tan_shoes (107)
create implication brown_sneakers (1) -> brown_shoes (2837)
create implication white_sneakers (383) -> white_shoes (3467)
create implication blue_sneakers (179) -> blue_shoes (1953)
create implication orange_sneakers (33) -> orange_shoes (617)
create implication red_sneakers (403) -> red_shoes (4911)
create implication pink_sneakers (90) -> pink_shoes (1285)
create implication pink_sneakers (90) -> pink_shoes (1285)
create implication teal_sneakers (6) -> teal_shoes (34)
create implication black_sneakers (269) -> black_shoes (6467)
create implication green_sneakers (72) -> sneakers (12589)
create implication teal_sneakers (6) -> sneakers (12589)
create implication yellow_sneakers (57) -> sneakers (12589)
create implication grey_sneakers (34) -> sneakers (12589)
create implication tan_sneakers (3) -> sneakers (12589)
create implication brown_sneakers (1) -> sneakers (12589)
create implication white_sneakers (383) -> sneakers (12589)
create implication blue_sneakers (179) -> sneakers (12589)
create implication orange_sneakers (33) -> sneakers (12589)
create implication red_sneakers (403) -> sneakers (12589)
create implication pink_sneakers (90) -> sneakers (12589)
create implication pink_sneakers (90) -> sneakers (12589)

Reason: There are colors/sneaker type tags that don't imply sneakers. I'll just start some here.

EDIT: The bulk update request #11176 (forum #450121) has been approved by @spe.

Updated by auto moderator

HardShirt

Member

The bulk update request #11178 is pending approval.

create implication black_sneakers (269) -> sneakers (12589)
create implication torn_sneakers (12) -> sneakers (12589)
create implication torn_sneakers (12) -> torn_footwear (876)
create implication toeless_sneakers (11) -> toeless_footwear (9636)
create implication toeless_sneakers (11) -> toeless_shoes (580)
create alias open_toe_sneakers (7) -> toeless_sneakers (11)
create alias open_toed_sneakers (0) -> toeless_sneakers (11)
create implication print_sneakers (2) -> print_footwear (84)
create implication print_sneakers (2) -> sneakers (12589)
create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> sneakers (12589)
create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> gistening_footwear (0)
create implication platform_sneakers (1) -> platform_shoes (207)
create implication platform_sneakers (1) -> sneakers (12589)
create implication two_tone_sneakers (154) -> two_tone_shoes (1059)
create implication two_tone_sneakers (154) -> multicolored_sneakers (56)
create implication multicolored_sneakers (56) -> multicolored_shoes (1541)
create implication two_tone_sneakers (154) -> sneakers (12589)
create implication knee_sneakers (14) -> sneakers (12589)
create implication discarded_sneakers (3) -> sneakers (12589)
create implication discarded_sneakers (3) -> discarded_footwear (210)
create implication purple_sneakers (40) -> purple_shoes (782)
create implication purple_sneakers (40) -> purple_shoes (782)

Reason: Continuation of previous BUR request.

NOTE: I put the wrong forum topic

spe

Admin

A few issues with the second one.

  • create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> sneakers (11057)
  • create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> gistening_footwear (0)

These are weird. Only two posts and one of them doesn’t even look very glistening. Seems like a pointless tag. But if it is valid, shouldn’t it imply glistening_shoes instead? Also, gistening_footwear is a typo.

  • create implication torn_sneakers (8) -> torn_footwear (805)

Why not torn_shoes?

  • create implication toeless_sneakers (8) -> toeless_footwear (9127)
  • create implication toeless_sneakers (8) -> toeless_shoes (533)

These are redundant.

HardShirt

Member

spe said:
A few issues with the second one.

  • create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> sneakers (11057)
  • create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> gistening_footwear (0)

These are weird. Only two posts and one of them doesn’t even look very glistening. Seems like a pointless tag. But if it is valid, shouldn’t it imply glistening_shoes instead? Also, gistening_footwear is a typo.

  • create implication torn_sneakers (8) -> torn_footwear (805)

Why not torn_shoes?

  • create implication toeless_sneakers (8) -> toeless_footwear (9127)
  • create implication toeless_sneakers (8) -> toeless_shoes (533)

These are redundant.

Uhm...I can look through this again

HardShirt

Member

The bulk update request #11965 is pending approval.

remove implication torn_sneakers (12) -> torn_footwear (876) # missing
create implication torn_sneakers (12) -> torn_shoes (733)
create implication torn_shoes (733) -> torn_footwear (876)
remove implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> glistening_footwear (546) # missing
create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> glistening_shoes (192)
create implication glistening_shoes (192) -> glistening_footwear (546) # duplicate of implication #36801
remove implication torn_sneakers (12) -> torn_footwear (876) # missing
create implication torn_sneakers (12) -> torn_shoes (733)
create implication torn_shoes (733) -> torn_footwear (876)

Reason: A recommended correction from spe.

Alien Fluff

Former Staff

Shouldn't there be aliases made for all these to incorporate the British English word for the shoes (i.e. trainers)?

HardShirt

Member

alien_fluff said:
Shouldn't there be aliases made for all these to incorporate the British English word for the shoes (i.e. trainers)?

Uhm...maybe. I'm not entirely sure. Someone would have to make a bulk alias. Would the admins/janitors be on board with this...idk

Original page: https://e621.net/forum_topics/56951?page=1