Topic: Dipstick implications

The bulk update request #11083 is pending approval.

create implication dipstick_snout (83) -> snout (83715)
create implication dipstick_snout (83) -> snout_markings (2763)
create implication dipstick_hair (753) -> hair (2091976)
create implication dipstick_fingers (852) -> fingers (624299)
create implication dipstick_toes (516) -> toes (503392)
create implication dipstick_wings (103) -> wings (472516)
create implication dipstick_tentacles (57) -> tentacles (82738)
create implication dipstick_penis (43) -> penis (1829647)
create implication dipstick_tongue (9) -> tongue (1005259)
create implication dipstick_claws (8) -> claws (644453)

Reason: Consistent with other dipstick tags.

The bulk update request #11084 is pending approval.

create alias dipstick_nose (851) -> dipstick_snout (83)
create alias dipstick_tail_feathers (92) -> dipstick_feathers (167)
create alias dipstick_flesh_whiskers (6) -> dipstick_whiskers (16)
create alias dipstick_arms (301) -> gloves_(marking) (69410)
create alias dipstick_legs (219) -> socks_(marking) (55271)
change category dipstick_limbs (1644) -> invalid

Reason: Aliasing of overly specific or redundant body parts. From what I can tell, all posts tagged dipstick_nose are indistinguishable from a dipstick snout.

Not sure what should be done with dipstick_pedipalps, dipstick_face, dipstick_whiskers, dipstick_ear_fins, or dipstick_tusks. Are they too specific?

The implications to multicolored_* don't work when the dipstick color is a different shade of the base color.

watsit said:
The implications to *_multicolored don't work when the dipstick color is a different shade of the base color.

They're standard implications for existing dipstick tags, however. Should we make a BUR to remove those?

beholding said:
They're standard implications for existing dipstick tags, however. Should we make a BUR to remove those?

I'm not sure which dipstick tags still implicate multicolored besides dipstick_ears (dipstick_tail doesn't), but yes, they should be removed, IMO.

The bulk update request #11085 is pending approval.

remove implication dipstick_antennae (2472) -> multicolored_antennae (2950)
remove implication dipstick_ears (49474) -> multicolored_ears (62150)

Reason: Dipstick body parts can be different shades of the same hue, in which case they are not multicolored.