Topic: Clothes and the Intersex Family

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #11035 is pending approval.

create implication clothed_andromorph (247) -> andromorph (29236)
create implication clothed_andromorph (247) -> clothed_intersex (4675)
create implication clothed_gynomorph (4792) -> gynomorph (231164)
create implication clothed_gynomorph (4792) -> clothed_intersex (4675)
create implication clothed_herm (174) -> herm (31500)
create implication clothed_herm (174) -> clothed_intersex (4675)
create implication clothed_maleherm (37) -> maleherm (5506)
create implication clothed_maleherm (37) -> clothed_intersex (4675)
create implication clothed_intersex (4675) -> intersex (295447)
create implication clothed_intersex (4675) -> clothed (1364156)

Reason: Both clothed_male and clothed_female have these implications, and the normal versions of the intersex sub-tags all implicate intersex.

nin10dope said:
Are you sure about that?

yes. if this bur goes through clothed andro/gyno/herm/maleherm will imply clothed intersex, which will in turn imply clothed

manitka said:
yes. if this bur goes through clothed andro/gyno/herm/maleherm will imply clothed intersex, which will in turn imply clothed

Ohhhhhhh okay I get what he meant now
I thought he was saying that that implication already existed
Thanks for clarifying

nin10dope said:
Ohhhhhhh okay I get what he meant now
I thought he was saying that that implication already existed
Thanks for clarifying

no problem! bur talk can be confusing sometimes. Lord don't i know x'D

im always writing up BURS late at night and half my brain has gone, takes me like 3 read throughs lol

Original page: https://e621.net/forum_topics/56662?page=1