Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The bulk update request #10919 is pending approval.
create implication hand_in_pants (1063) -> pants (217664)
create implication hand_in_briefs (10) -> hand_in_underwear (1663)
create implication hand_in_briefs (10) -> briefs (21129)
Reason: The other hand_in_* tags implicate their respective clothing, but not these ones.
Bumping because this appears to have fallen through the cracks.
The problem is do we want/need to have more hand_in_* tags when hand_in_underwear briefs or similar could be sufficient?
One argument for more of them is that hand_in_panties already implies hand_in_underwear.
On the other hand, since there are so many subtypes of underwear, do we need to make hand_in_* tags for each of them?
The bulk update request #11182 is pending approval.
create alias hand_in_briefs (10) -> hand_in_underwear (1663)
Reason: An alternative.
For the record, I agree with TheGreatWolfgang on this; I think separate tags for each type of underwear is excessive.
