Topic: Multi dom/sub implications

The bulk update request #10852 is pending approval.

create implication two_doms_one_sub (2362) -> multiple_doms_one_sub (510)
create implication two_subs_one_dom (1401) -> multiple_subs_one_dom (151)
create implication two_doms_one_sub (2362) -> threesome (66527)
create implication two_subs_one_dom (1401) -> threesome (66527)
create implication multiple_doms_one_sub (510) -> dominant (181712)
create implication multiple_doms_one_sub (510) -> submissive (163059)
create implication multiple_subs_one_dom (151) -> dominant (181712)
create implication multiple_subs_one_dom (151) -> submissive (163059)

Reason: Hopefully self-explanatory. The only issue I foresee is that multiple_*_one_* ought to imply group, but that can't be done if two_*_one_* implies multiple_*_one_* without mistagging a lot of trio images as group.

If it is preferred to keep multiple_*_one_* separate, may I suggest changing the name to many_*_one_* to make it clearer that it's not a superset of two_*_one_*?

The bulk update request #10859 is pending approval.

create implication two_doms_one_sub (2362) -> threesome (66527)
create implication two_doms_one_sub (2362) -> dominant (181712)
create implication two_doms_one_sub (2362) -> submissive (163059)
create implication two_subs_one_dom (1401) -> threesome (66527)
create implication two_subs_one_dom (1401) -> dominant (181712)
create implication two_subs_one_dom (1401) -> submissive (163059)
create implication multiple_doms_one_sub (510) -> group_sex (118160)
create implication multiple_doms_one_sub (510) -> dominant (181712)
create implication multiple_doms_one_sub (510) -> submissive (163059)
create implication multiple_subs_one_dom (151) -> group_sex (118160)
create implication multiple_subs_one_dom (151) -> dominant (181712)
create implication multiple_subs_one_dom (151) -> submissive (163059)

Reason: Alternative for those who prefer multiple_*_one_* and two_*_one_* remain separate.