Topic: Some NC implications

The bulk update request #10810 is pending approval.

Reason: Considering all the *_penetrating_* tags imply both a *_penetrated tag, and a *_penetrating tag; it feels like all of these implications should exist, too. And a lot more, besides, but the system only allows for up to 25 implications per BUR (plus I'm too tired to think of all of them, anyway).

Why is this so heavily downvoted?

The *_rape tags need to be renamed since they're too ambiguous as to who's being raped. Adding implications will just require more work to undo the implications with the renaming.

Also, we're not really fond of adding more x_verbing_y tags (beyond x_penetrating_y) when the individual x_verbing and y_verbed tags are good enough.

So I see. Previous discussion has taken place at topic #40167 and topic #42000.

I feel I must ask why those requests have languished in request limbo for years when countless other requests have been processed in that time. I would think these ought to be high priority.