The bulk update request #10794 is pending approval.
create implication looking_at_partner's_penis (309) -> looking_at_partner's_genitalia (130)
create implication looking_at_partner's_balls (9) -> looking_at_partner's_genitalia (130)
create implication looking_at_partner's_penis (309) -> looking_at_penis (21340)
create implication looking_at_partner's_balls (9) -> looking_at_balls (196)
create implication looking_at_partner's_genitalia (130) -> looking_at_genitalia (24149)
create implication looking_at_partner's_genitalia (130) -> looking_at_partner (41725)
create implication looking_at_partner's_butt (28) -> looking_at_butt (3426)
create implication looking_at_partner's_butt (28) -> looking_at_partner (41725)
create implication looking_at_partner's_crotch (12) -> looking_at_crotch (203)
create implication looking_at_partner's_crotch (12) -> looking_at_partner (41725)
create implication looking_at_partner's_belly (2) -> looking_at_belly (1438)
create implication looking_at_partner's_belly (2) -> looking_at_partner (41725)
Reason: I noticed these tags had been created but didn't have any implications pointing them back to looking_at_[thing being looked at] and looking_at_partner.
As for whether these implications should be created rather than the tags deleted, I think it should be pretty easy to keep them clean, and more specific tagging systems are never a bad thing.