Topic: [REJECTED] bowser_logo (again)

The bulk update request #10435 has been rejected.

remove implication bowser_logo_thong (65) -> bowser_logo (286)
create implication bowser_logo_thong (65) -> bowser_logo_underwear (99)
create implication bowser_logo_jockstrap (20) -> bowser_logo_underwear (99)
create implication bowser_logo_boxer_briefs (6) -> bowser_logo_underwear (99)
create implication bowser_logo_speedo (5) -> bowser_logo_swimwear (5)
create implication bowser_logo_diaper (1) -> bowser_logo (286)
create implication bowser_logo_diaper (1) -> diaper (35558)
create implication bowser_logo_underwear (99) -> bowser_logo (286)
create implication bowser_logo_underwear (99) -> underwear (425305)
create implication bowser_logo_swimwear (5) -> bowser_logo (286)
create implication bowser_logo_swimwear (5) -> swimwear (146451)

Reason: Hopefully this isn't too specific to be considered, I'd like to add those implications.

I added/created lots of those tags myself, I want to be clear with that. I don't think any of them are incorrect, but if it isn't worth to add I understand.

My last request was https://e621.net/forum_topics/55182, so I'd like to slightly alter that here.

EDIT: The bulk update request #10435 (forum #439828) has been rejected by @romanicyte2.

This is excessive and unnecessary.

OK.
May I keep the tagged galleries or should I remove the tags?

romanicyte2 said:
OK.
May I keep the tagged galleries or should I remove the tags?

You can keep them for now until another BUR aliases these away.

It is recommended to use sets next time for personal projects such as this and for you to keep whatever posts you have tagged.

we could probably have an insignia_underwear tag (and potentially subtags for diffrent types of underwear). then we tag what insignia is used separately.

The bulk update request #10435 (forum #439828) has been rejected by @romanicyte2.