Topic: Translucent Genitalia BUR

The bulk update request #10353 is pending approval.

remove implication translucent_penis (3620) -> translucent (98531)
create implication translucent_balls (105) -> translucent_genitalia (6)
remove implication translucent_balls (105) -> translucent (98531)
create implication translucent_pussy (7) -> translucent_genitalia (6)
create implication translucent_pussy (7) -> pussy (74)
create implication translucent_genitalia (6) -> translucent (98531)
create implication translucent_penis (3620) -> translucent_genitalia (6)

Reason: All these tags are translucent genitalia. Translucent genitalia is genitalia that's translucent, so that implication is pretty self-explanatory. I've unimplied translucent from the penis and balls tags to prevent redundancy. Translucent pussies are pussies.

The only comment I have is that I think the individual lines in a BUR aren't guaranteed to run in the same order that they appear in the BUR.

If that's true, that means you'd need to edit this BUR to only have these five lines

remove implication translucent_penis (3202) -> translucent (82655)
remove implication translucent_balls (84) -> translucent (82655)
create implication translucent_pussy (3) -> translucent_genitalia (6)
create implication translucent_pussy (3) -> pussy (922562)
create implication translucent_genitalia (6) -> translucent (82655)

and then create a new BUR with these two lines, to be approved after this BUR has completed:

create implication translucent_penis (3202) -> translucent_genitalia (6)
create implication translucent_balls (84) -> translucent_genitalia (6)

That way, you can be sure that the two remove implication lines in the first BUR have fully taken effect, before the new create implication lines in the second BUR go into effect.

When you create the new BUR, you can cite this forum topic 55041, so the new BUR will also appear in this same thread.

The colored-name critters are familiar with this situation; if they agree with both BURs, they know to approve the first BUR, wait for it to go through, and then approve the second BUR.

kora_viridian said:
The only comment I have is that I think the individual lines in a BUR aren't guaranteed to run in the same order that they appear in the BUR.

If that's true, that means you'd need to edit this BUR to only have these five lines

remove implication translucent_penis (3202) -> translucent (82655)
remove implication translucent_balls (84) -> translucent (82655)
create implication translucent_pussy (3) -> translucent_genitalia (6)
create implication translucent_pussy (3) -> pussy (922562)
create implication translucent_genitalia (6) -> translucent (82655)

and then create a new BUR with these two lines, to be approved after this BUR has completed:

create implication translucent_penis (3202) -> translucent_genitalia (6)
create implication translucent_balls (84) -> translucent_genitalia (6)

That way, you can be sure that the two remove implication lines in the first BUR have fully taken effect, before the new create implication lines in the second BUR go into effect.

When you create the new BUR, you can cite this forum topic 55041, so the new BUR will also appear in this same thread.

The colored-name critters are familiar with this situation; if they agree with both BURs, they know to approve the first BUR, wait for it to go through, and then approve the second BUR.

Non colored-name critter here
This situation is perfectly fine, no changes necessary.
See topic #45280