Topic: Age pairing standardization

The bulk update request #9995 is pending approval.

create alias adolescent_on_adult (0) -> adult_on_adolescent (1204)
create alias child_on_adult (0) -> adult_on_child (3812)
create alias toddler_on_adult (0) -> adult_on_toddler (240)
create alias baby_on_adult (0) -> adult_on_baby (839)
create alias child_on_adolescent (0) -> adolescent_on_child (709)
create alias toddler_on_adolescent (0) -> adolescent_on_toddler (9)
create alias baby_on_adolescent (0) -> adolescent_on_baby (5)
create alias toddler_on_child (0) -> child_on_toddler (32)
create alias baby_on_child (2) -> child_on_baby (24)
create alias baby_on_toddler (0) -> toddler_on_baby (1)

Reason: Standardizing age pairing tags to (older)_on_(younger) format.

Edit: I made a mistake on the last line, my apologies. It should be baby_on_toddler -> toddler_on_baby.

beholding said:
Edit: I made a mistake on the last line, my apologies. It should be baby_on_toddler -> toddler_on_baby.

You know you can edit your own BURs right? See BUR #9995.

Thank you, it is now fixed.

Using this topic to talk about adult on adult. It's basically a non_sexualised_young alternative, i assume we aren't keeping it?

snpthecat said:
Using this topic to talk about adult on adult. It's basically a non_sexualised_young alternative, i assume we aren't keeping it?

nonsexualized_young is still an experimental tag. It's too early to say if it'll stay or if a better alternative will be devised. adult on adult should stay for now.