Topic: Age pairings BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #9994 is pending approval.

create implication adult_on_adolescent (1203) -> adult_on_young (16849)
create implication adult_on_child (3803) -> child (37945) # duplicate of implication #65729
create implication adult_on_toddler (240) -> adult_on_young (16849)
create implication adult_on_toddler (240) -> toddler (3848)
create implication adult_on_baby (838) -> adult_on_young (16849)
create implication adult_on_baby (838) -> baby (6676)
create implication adolescent_on_adolescent (1473) -> young_on_young (12000)
create implication adolescent_on_child (708) -> age_difference (82472)
create implication adolescent_on_child (708) -> young_on_young (12000)
create implication adolescent_on_toddler (9) -> age_difference (82472)
create implication adolescent_on_toddler (9) -> young_on_young (12000)
create implication adolescent_on_toddler (9) -> toddler (3848)
create implication adolescent_on_toddler (9) -> adolescent (21692)
create implication adolescent_on_baby (5) -> age_difference (82472)
create implication adolescent_on_baby (5) -> young_on_young (12000)
create implication adolescent_on_baby (5) -> baby (6676)
create implication adolescent_on_baby (5) -> adolescent (21692)
create implication child_on_toddler (32) -> age_difference (82472)
create implication child_on_toddler (32) -> young_on_young (12000)
create implication child_on_toddler (32) -> toddler (3848)
create implication child_on_toddler (32) -> child (37945)
create implication child_on_baby (24) -> age_difference (82472)
create implication child_on_baby (24) -> young_on_young (12000)
create implication child_on_baby (24) -> baby (6676)
create implication child_on_baby (24) -> child (37945)

Reason: These implications should be standard for all age pairings, but are currently only present on a few tags. (Younger pairings excluded to cut the BUR down to 25 lines, as they're vanishingly rare anyway.)

Original page: https://e621.net/forum_topics/54264?page=1