The bulk update request #9876 is pending approval.

remove implication full_tour (445) -> safe_vore (2110)

Reason: Not all full tours mean a safe vore situation as the prey may still end up digested or harmed in some other way after said full tour.

can you give an example?

pleaseletmein said:
can you give an example?

Here's three instances:
https://e621.net/posts/2993545?q=full_tour+digestion
https://e621.net/posts/5223758?q=full_tour
https://e621.net/posts/4938733?q=full_tour+digestion

endosomacop said:
Here's three instances:
https://e621.net/posts/2993545?q=full_tour+digestion
https://e621.net/posts/5223758?q=full_tour
https://e621.net/posts/4938733?q=full_tour+digestion

First two depict safe vore (first one has one round of safe vore, and one round of fatal vore), third one does not depict full tour at all.

rupikonna said:
First two depict safe vore (first one has one round of safe vore, and one round of fatal vore), third one does not depict full tour at all.

The tags concern prey fate, don't they? If they are safe for the first half a sequence but are dying in the second half, it usually is seen as fatal vore when it isn't a full tour. Making them do a second not so safe tour isnt much different from that especially if it's the pred immediately doing it.

endosomacop said:
The tags concern prey fate, don't they? If they are safe for the first half a sequence but are dying in the second half, it usually is seen as fatal vore when it isn't a full tour. Making them do a second not so safe tour isn't much different from that especially if it's the pred immediately doing it.

Then it is no longer full_tour. A tour is…as an example, when an American YouTuber goes across the country, letting their fans see them. Or when a German band comes to America, letting their fans see them. Or when you go onto an island, and a tour guide points out the significant locations like the lighthouse that was once used as speakeasy. Or when your annoying but cheerful friend drags you into a museum and points out where the mistakes are in the displays, telling you that the cigarette lighter that the wax figure is holding is wrong because that specific lighter was invented two months after what the display is representing.
Tours do not end in death.

Even if there's no examples at the moment (or if there are I'm really not willing to dig deeper), I vote to unimply because how it could happen is far from inconceivable.

If the person comes out on the other side alive, but with horrific acid burns or bite wounds or... other byproducts of digestion... that is not safe. Not fatal, still full tour, but not safe by any means.

lendrimujina said:
Even if there's no examples at the moment (or if there are I'm really not willing to dig deeper), I vote to unimply because how it could happen is far from inconceivable.

If the person comes out on the other side alive, but with horrific acid burns or bite wounds or... other byproducts of digestion... that is not safe. Not fatal, still full tour, but not safe by any means.

It's a matter of how we define full_tour, more than anything

rupikonna said:
First two depict safe vore (first one has one round of safe vore, and one round of fatal vore), third one does not depict full tour at all.

The second post does bring up the question of how full_tour can be used. Since the act of vore can be spread out over a couple of pages, and general tags are independent of other posts in the pool. So you can't tag it on any posts, which is definitely not what we want.

Also should we have a full_tour -esque tag where the prey does not necessarily have to be unharmed? Maybe we could use full_tour as its name, and what we consider as full_tour now could be moved over to osha_tour