Implicating Translation_request -> Text.

Reason: There can't be a translation request without text present (by the definition of the wiki).

Then what about hieroglyphs, sign language or post #187121

slyroon said:
Then what about hieroglyphs, sign language or post #187121

I don't think you'll see a translation_request for those. And hieroglyphs are a kind of text. So is sign language. A text doesn't have to be written in the characters you're familiar with. And that Apple thingy was text too.

Asphyxia said:
And hieroglyphs are a kind of text. So is sign language. A text doesn't have to be written in the characters you're familiar with. And that Apple thingy was text too.

This is all true.

slyroon said:
Then what about hieroglyphs, sign language or post #187121

Added the text tag in this post. Not because of the apples, but it has some other text in it anyway.

Is it nessasary for an admin to give a "thumbs up" for tag implication/alias to actually pass?