Aliasing eyes -> invalid_tag.

Reason: Same reason why tags like tail, arms, or head were removed.

The eyes tag would work like the text. Everyone has eyes, but not the same color. Should just be implemented to every color of eye listed.

I dunno, it serves a purpose.
I mean, how are you supposed to blacklist those creepy characters with eyes.

Hammie said:
I dunno, it serves a purpose.
I mean, how are you supposed to blacklist those creepy characters with eyes.

creepy_eyes could work.

furballs_dc said:
creepy_eyes could work.

I meant that all characters with eyes are creepy.

Hammie said:
I meant that all characters with eyes are creepy.

post #353170

Not creepy at all. :3

furballs_dc said:
post #353170

Not creepy at all. :3

Bad example XD

Falord said:
Bad example XD

Best example. :3

I thought it was meant to show eyes in a background like this:
post #73471
but... it isn't, so I agree it should be aliased.

hmm... I'm not sure if this tag is needed. It would work like an umbrella ag, but I think I agree with Gilda. It's just not very helpful as it describes somethig that 99% of the site has, without narrowing it down. We should encourage users to tag eye color and unusual characteristics of eyes

Well, it could be very helpful to implicate eye in all colors and other characteristics so it is easier to find thos pictures that do NOT have tagged with eye colors or things like no_eyes.

There are 4141 pages with pictures that do not posses the eye tag, many of them possesing tags like colors however. With a basic account you can just take 6 tags, so you can't possibly get all those colors in one search to find those pictures, that do not have any eye color mentioned yet.

Linnefer said:
Well, it could be very helpful to implicate eye in all colors and other characteristics so it is easier to find thos pictures that do NOT have tagged with eye colors or things like no_eyes.

There are 4141 pages with pictures that do not posses the eye tag, many of them possesing tags like colors however. With a basic account you can just take 6 tags, so you can't possibly get all those colors in one search to find those pictures, that do not have any eye color mentioned yet.

I think that no_eyes, and *eyes searches are enough. Same reasons for existence could be argued for tags like tail, and it was aliased.

I was trying to make a joke -.-

I think you would know that jokes aren't exactly recognized on this site.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
I think that no_eyes, and *eyes searches are enough. Same reasons for existence could be argued for tags like tail, and it was aliased.

Well, *eyes does not work the other way round: you can't check pictures for pictures without an eye-tag with -*eyes - it reveals only false positives as it shows likely all pictures or most of them.