Topic: [APPROVED] Underwear is not (always) Bottomwear

The bulk update request #9755 is active.

remove implication furgonomic_underwear (504) -> furgonomic_bottomwear (2500)
create implication furgonomic_underwear (504) -> underwear (424864)

Reason: underwear -> clothing, not bottomwear
Followup: implicate furgonomic_underwear -> furgonomics

EDIT: The bulk update request #9755 (forum #425202) has been approved by @spe.

The bulk update request #9755 (forum #425202) has been approved by @spe.

The bulk update request #9763 is active.

create implication furgonomic_underwear (504) -> furgonomics (66651)

Reason: Followup

EDIT: The bulk update request #9763 (forum #425284) has been approved by @spe.

Using this BUR to comment that we imply furgonomic clothing to furgonomics directly rather than going through furgonomic clothing. I wonder if that would be better for search or if it doesn't really matter

The bulk update request #9763 (forum #425284) has been approved by @spe.

snpthecat said:
Using this BUR to comment that we imply furgonomic clothing to furgonomics directly rather than going through furgonomic clothing. I wonder if that would be better for search or if it doesn't really matter

I think it's alright how it is personally, a lot of other things can have furgonomic design besides clothing, ex. chairs with spaces for tails to slide in