Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #65604 ffm_threesome -> ffm has been rejected.
Reason: Threesomes containing two female characters and one male characters always meets the criteria of ffm, but not every single ffm interaction is a threesome
EDIT: The tag implication ffm_threesome -> ffm (forum #424406) has been rejected by @spe.
Updated by auto moderator
the threesome tags are an exception, not the rule
we don't do pairing tags beyond two (e.g. male/female)
The tag implication ffm_threesome -> ffm (forum #424406) has been rejected by @spe.
Yeah, having these tags for every combination of the 7 gender tags would get really big, really fast. This same scenario can be covered by searching threesome male/female female/female
The bulk update request #9675 is pending approval.
create alias mmf (1064) -> male/female (666110)
create alias ffm (2019) -> male/female (666110)
create alias mfm (1) -> male/female (666110)
Reason:
donovan_dmc said:
we don't do pairing tags beyond two (e.g. male/female)
These tags don't require sex, so aliasing to the respective *_threesome tag would cause mistags. Not all ffm tags have the two females interacting (e.g. post #5118903), and not all mmf tags have the two males interacting (e.g. post #4912381), so male/male, female/female, and bisexual won't always apply to the respective tags, but they should all have at least one male interacting with at least one female, leaving male/female or group as the only applicable tags, and the former seems more informative to me.
I'd really rather not be aliasing away tags that actually provide reliable search results that can't be obtained through any other combination of existing tags, at least while other things like topic #43865 and topic #43888 are still in limbo.
If we had #_gender tags or male_majority/female_majority I'd vote to send this tag to oblivion.
spe said:
This same scenario can be covered by searching threesome male/female female/female
While reasonably common, an FFM threesome does not require female/female interaction:
Updated
