The tag alias #73434 stink_fumes -> smelly has been rejected.

Reason: ...I'm not sure how these could possibly be shown differently?

EDIT: The tag alias stink_fumes -> smelly (forum #423548) has been rejected by @slyroon.

wandering_spaniel said:
The tag alias #73434 stink_fumes -> smelly has been rejected.

Reason: ...I'm not sure how these could possibly be shown differently?

The thing is, I'm not into stink fumes/lines, but I like stinky/musky stuff, if that makes sense. Stink lines tend to make things look more undesirable, so I often exclude those from my search

mr_bootylover said:
The thing is, I'm not into stink fumes/lines, but I like stinky/musky stuff, if that makes sense. Stink lines tend to make things look more undesirable, so I often exclude those from my search

Stink_lines is a separate tag that implies stink_fumes. If this went through, stink_lines would imply smelly instead

Since stink_fumes isn't for stink lines, what is it for? There's no wiki :(

wandering_spaniel said:
Stink_lines is a separate tag that implies stink_fumes. If this went through, stink_lines would imply smelly instead

Since stink_fumes isn't for stink lines, what is it for? There's no wiki :(

post #5091828

regsmutt said:
post #5091828

Oh, I have farts blacklisted, I guess I just didn't see most of the tag's contents lol.
So is stink_fumes meant to be for more extreme smelly stuff then?

Actually wait, it can't be for extreme vs not extreme because stink_lines implies stink_fumes and you can have small unobtrusive stink lines in perfectly SFW art

Is stink_fumes meant to be for clouds or lines, and smelly includes images where characters are simply reacting to a smell but no clouds or lines are shown? And then stink_fumes would imply smelly?

Looking through these posts, it does not seem like many people care about the distinction between lines and fumes. Maybe aliasing lines to fumes and adding an implication to smelly would be better?

wandering_spaniel said:
Actually wait, it can't be for extreme vs not extreme because stink_lines implies stink_fumes and you can have small unobtrusive stink lines in perfectly SFW art

Is stink_fumes meant to be for clouds or lines, and smelly includes images where characters are simply reacting to a smell but no clouds or lines are shown? And then stink_fumes would imply smelly?

Fumes would be for visible stuff I'd think. Implying smelly would probably work. The input of someone who is into this might be needed here if there's a reason why it shouldn't be that isn't obvious to those not nose-deep in stink kink.

The bulk update request #9591 is pending approval.

create implication stink_fumes (1640) -> smelly (7035) # duplicate of implication #62679
create implication stink_cloud (154) -> stink_fumes (1640)

Reason: The alternative

regsmutt said:
nose-deep in stink kink.

Lmaooo thank you

Oh nice, topic #44180, apparently this has been brought up before. That user says fumes are for visual depictions of stink, yeah. I assume non-visual would be just other characters reacting to smell then. Guessing the vast majority of stinky art is stink_fumes rather than just smelly.

The tag alias stink_fumes -> smelly (forum #423548) has been rejected by @slyroon.