Reason: Notable implication which was known to be be tagged without inflation

Should it be an alias instead?

archiegoldrips said:
Reason: Notable implication which was known to be be tagged without inflation

Not the proper way of suggesting an implication. Simply typing in the title and reason without going through the suggestion queue will do nothing.
If you had encountered an error while suggesting, it is most likely because it already exists (see topic #37904).

regsmutt said:
Should it be an alias instead?

I'm not sure if inflation would still apply in scenarios where there is "pre-inflation" (i.e., imminent_inflation) or "post-inflation" (i.e., bursting).

thegreatwolfgang said:
I'm not sure if inflation would still apply in scenarios where there is "pre-inflation" (i.e., imminent_inflation) or "post-inflation" (i.e., bursting).

I don't think those would be inflation_fetish if it's not being actively sexualized in some way. There are problems with *_fetish tags being applied to images that just contain the thing (e.g. images that merely contain a foot_focus and smelly_feet being indiscriminately tagged as foot_fetish, when foot_fetish should only apply when the feet are being fetishized like with footjobs or foot_sniffing). If inflation_fetish is being overly misused on posts that just contain something inflation-related without being fetishized by characters in the image, it may be best to alias it away (like the currently pending humiliation fetish and musk fetish aliases). Many imminent_inflation and bursting posts are already tagged with inflation already too (and I'm not sure a number of posts tagged imminent_inflation even qualify by TWYS).

If the two are being used to mean the same thing, there's no reason to have two tags for the same thing.