The tag implication #64997 striped_sweater -> striped_clothing has been rejected.
Reason: It makes sense
EDIT: The tag implication stripped_sweater -> striped_clothing (forum #420949) has been rejected by @spe.
Updated by auto moderator
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #64997 striped_sweater -> striped_clothing has been rejected.
Reason: It makes sense
EDIT: The tag implication stripped_sweater -> striped_clothing (forum #420949) has been rejected by @spe.
Updated by auto moderator
Typo?
Unfortunately both of these threads have typos in the names. Because they're both on the same topic you should try rejecting both of these and redoing the requests with a single BUR.
regsmutt said:
Unfortunately both of these threads have typos in the names. Because they're both on the same topic you should try rejecting both of these and redoing the requests with a single BUR.
The implication already exists through striped_topwear
The bulk update request #9387 is active.
create alias stripped_markings (12) -> striped_markings (41358)
create alias stripped_sweater (0) -> striped_sweater (310)
Reason: parity with other "stripped" typos
EDIT: The bulk update request #9387 (forum #420960) has been approved by @spe.
Updated by auto moderator
Not coincidentally the only hit for "Stripped" sweater is by the OP. (until I edit it right now)
lafcadio said:
The bulk update request #9387 is active.create alias stripped_markings (12) -> striped_markings (41358)
create alias stripped_sweater (0) -> striped_sweater (310)Reason: parity with other "stripped" typos
I wonder if the second alias is necessary, it's only been used twice, one by OP and the other 3 years ago. Though it can't hurt to include it
The tag implication stripped_sweater -> striped_clothing (forum #420949) has been rejected by @spe.
The bulk update request #9387 (forum #420960) has been approved by @spe.