Topic: [REJECTED] Grade this BUR

The bulk update request #9232 has been rejected.

mass update graded_belly -> graded_torso
mass update ruler_condom -> graded_condom
create implication graded_balls (3) -> graded_body_part (0)
create implication graded_balls (3) -> balls (1258896)
create implication graded_breasts (3) -> graded_body_part (0)
create implication graded_breasts (3) -> breasts (2049180)
create implication graded_condom (2) -> condom (31009)
create implication graded_dildo (155) -> dildo (93165)
create implication graded_penis (263) -> graded_body_part (0)
create implication graded_penis (263) -> penis (1830157)
create implication graded_tail (5) -> graded_body_part (0)
create implication graded_tail (5) -> tail (1742176)
create implication graded_throat (36) -> graded_body_part (0)
create implication graded_torso (1) -> graded_body_part (0)

Reason: improvement of topic #35628

not sure how to place condom and dildo under the same umbrella as the rest

EDIT: The bulk update request #9232 (forum #419176) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

gattonero2001 said:
mass update ruler_condom -> graded_condom

Should be reversed, IMO. "Ruler condom" is less ambiguous and brings to mind more clearly what it means, even if you've never heard the term before. The other tags could probably do with better names too; "graded" can take on more meanings, ranging from quality (e.g. graded meat), to correctness (e.g. a test grade), to angles (e.g. a slope grade), to length (e.g. a depth grade), creating a risk of ambiguity, if other names are possible.

this tagname seems a bit ambiguous, "graded" makes me think of like someone grading a school paper or a piece of meat, but most of the posts under this tag are closer to the markings on graduated cylinders.

I'm inclined to agree with Watsit in that "graded" is ambiguous. I initially thought it referred to the coloring. Would tags like throat/tail/balls/penis/etc._grading or throat/tail/balls/penis/etc._gauge be more obvious?

The bulk update request #9232 (forum #419176) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.