The wiki not_furry says that "zero pictured - A pretty landscape, a toaster, a car, and other miscellaneous things". But for searching and viewing utility I find that rule a bit cumbersome. For example, posts included in a pool can have posts showing no creatures, and it will be tagged as with the non furry tag. For people who have it blacklisted, they probably dont mind about seeing such a post. Its a nitpick though I feel like it should be changed.

How do you feel about it?

I guess users like me could use the blacklist combo 'not_furry -rating:s' but that wont cover all scenarios.

dinbyy said:
The wiki not_furry says that "zero pictured - A pretty landscape, a toaster, a car, and other miscellaneous things". But for searching and viewing utility I find that rule a bit cumbersome. For example, posts included in a pool can have posts showing no creatures, and it will be tagged as with the non furry tag. For people who have it blacklisted, they probably dont mind about seeing such a post. Its a nitpick though I feel like it should be changed.

How do you feel about it?

they could add -zero_pictured to the line containing not_furry in their blacklist then. Also zero_pictured may or may not be inherently not_furry, see topic #44859

post #4863811 is an example of a zero_pictured post that got removed basically because it was out of context. It didn't directly have any signs of furry fandom other than the rabbit ears.
Just showing how something can be disqualified on this site.