The bulk update request #8463 is pending approval.

create implication zero_pictured (2011) -> not_furry (159711)

Reason: The question is whether something can be not not_furry while also qualifying for zero_pictured.

If the quality of being "furry" or not is only restricted to characters, then this implication should be valid

Tentacles might come up as an edge case since they're not characters, and sometimes might be not not_furry

Maybe not? There's a couple odd cases with plushies (post #1950922), shadows (post #3435001), picture-in-picture (post #4124857), and statues (post #1553781). They're definitely all zero_pictured, and all identifiable 'furry' characters so???