Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #64552 tea_party_style_glaceon -> maid_uniform has been rejected.
Reason: This is just a maid outfit on glaceon.
EDIT: The tag implication tea_party_style_glaceon -> maid_uniform (forum #416758) has been rejected by @spe.
Updated by auto moderator
post #4574960
Doesn't look like a maid uniform.
donovan_dmc said:
Then it should be aliased to glaceon
Tbh all of these holowear_(pokemon) tags should be aliased to either their species or the holowear tag. Do we really need all those extra species tags for pokemon in costumes?
regsmutt said:
Tbh all of these holowear_(pokemon) tags should be aliased to either their species or the holowear tag. Do we really need all those extra species tags for pokemon in costumes?
post #3387404
This is a Gardevoir holowear but it's not on Gardevoir. It's useful for identifying certain features, so I see no need to remove it.
lafcadio said:
post #3387404
This is a Gardevoir holowear but it's not on Gardevoir. It's useful for identifying certain features, so I see no need to remove it.
That is a delphox in a hat.
regsmutt said:
That is a delphox in a hat.
Reductive.
The tag implication tea_party_style_glaceon -> maid_uniform (forum #416758) has been rejected by @spe.
The bulk update request #9573 is pending approval.
create implication tea_party_style_glaceon (154) -> holowear_(pokemon) (1625)
Reason: Since we're keeping the holowear tags...
lafcadio said:
post #3387404
This is a Gardevoir holowear but it's not on Gardevoir. It's useful for identifying certain features, so I see no need to remove it.
This seems like a weird naming scheme, imagine we had a femboy nick wilde tag but instead of nick as a femboy it was any femboy dressed as nick.. doesn't really make sense?
donovan_dmc said:
This seems like a weird naming scheme, imagine we had a femboy nick wilde tag but instead of nick as a femboy it was any femboy dressed as nick.. doesn't really make sense?
Extra weird that they're character tags, when they're not specific characters (let alone sets of clothing).
