I'm guessing I'm misunderstanding something but my post (https://e621.net/posts/4960462) was removed due to there being "zero pictured" characters. It was tagged correctly as zero_pictured, why would that tag be a default option if its not allowed?

For comics and such, I believe. Things where the overall sequence is furry focused, but you might have credit pages or covers with no one pictured.

We also have human only, but its existence doesn't somehow imply that every human-only image is fair game.

If you look through the existing examples of zero_pictured, the vast majority are directly linked to another, more relevant post either by a pool or a parent-child relationship.

quenir said:
For comics and such, I believe. Things where the overall sequence is furry focused, but you might have credit pages or covers with no one pictured.

lafcadio said:
We also have human only, but its existence doesn't somehow imply that every human-only image is fair game.

If you look through the existing examples of zero_pictured, the vast majority are directly linked to another, more relevant post either by a pool or a parent-child relationship

Ahh i see. thank you both!

In addition to the pool/parent-child exception, there's also grandfathered_content.