Is this not a website for sharing and enjoying erotic art of characters with jizzum oozing from every orifice? If so, then how exactly is leaving a harmless gooner comment a violation of the TOS? Your precious AI is broken, whoever owns this place!

Every single thing you said in your post was fundamentally wrong from start to finish.
This also is not how you appeal these kinds of records.

I wanna print & frame this and put it on my wall.

falogthered said:
Your precious AI is broken, whoever owns this place!

such disrespect. "Your precious AI", he has a name.

and he's not broken, you just can't read. the rule was already sited at you in your record, but here it is again anyway.

dba_afish said:
such disrespect. "Your precious AI", he has a name.

and he's not broken, you just can't read. the rule was already sited at you in your record, but here it is again anyway.

His profile described him as an AI, I thought that meant the whole thing was autogenerated. It was a stupid mistake in retrospect and I publicly apologize to Cinder for it. I'm still not satisfied with his decision.

lafcadio said:
Every single thing you said in your post was fundamentally wrong from start to finish.
This also is not how you appeal these kinds of records.

1. No, nothing I said was wrong. I expressed my feelings towards a FICTIONAL cartoon bunny from a video game who was deliberately drawn in such a way that is designed to elicit feelings of lust and desire. If I were to say something like "I wanna catch an actual rabbit and rape it to death" THAT would be fundamentally wrong. All I said was I'd relish in the opportunity to make babies with said cartoon character if given the opportunity.

Then again, perhaps the very idea of perpetuating life causes some individuals actual physical pain. Like showing a cross to a vampire.

2. I'm not appealing, I'm openly complaining about a broken system. Standing on a soap box, to use the vernacular. But perhaps that's the problem. Perhaps I'm simply mean to let the system rape me like a good little "useful eater".

falogthered said:
Is this not a website for sharing and enjoying erotic art of characters with jizzum oozing from every orifice? If so, then how exactly is leaving a harmless gooner comment a violation of the TOS? Your precious AI is broken, whoever owns this place!

Supposedly, some artists don't like it and could potentially file a takedown if the comments get too creepy. More importantly, the staff don't seem to like it.

^{Incidentally, there have been exactly 6 occasions I decided to comment something horny on another rule 34 site, since it would be too much for this site, and two of those comments baited out DMs, which I didn't notice cuz I don't really use the site. Is that really what sexual stuff is like outside this site? A whole 33% chance of baiting out gooners by saying something vaguely gooner-like without asking for DMs or having any sort of profile? Interesting...}

You'd think someone with a 12 year-old account would know better about the site.

crocogator said:
Supposedly, some artists don't like it and could potentially file a takedown if the comments get too creepy. More importantly, the staff don't seem to like it.

^{Incidentally, there have been exactly 6 occasions I decided to comment something horny on another rule 34 site, since it would be too much for this site, and two of those comments baited out DMs, which I didn't notice cuz I don't really use the site. Is that really what sexual stuff is like outside this site? A whole 33% chance of baiting out gooners by saying something vaguely gooner-like without asking for DMs or having any sort of profile? Interesting...}

That doesn't make it right. Censorship is evil no matter how you slice it.

thehuskyk9 said:
You'd think someone with a 12 year-old account would know better about the site.

Doesn't make it right.

It's pretty simple- the people running the site don't want to host or moderate those kinds of comments. That's really all there is to it.

falogthered said:
That doesn't make it right. Censorship is evil no matter how you slice it.

Censorship isn't evil when you can just go to a different site that mirrors all the content you care about.

falogthered said:
That doesn't make it right. Censorship is evil no matter how you slice it.

lmao.

regsmutt said:
It's pretty simple- the people running the site don't want to host or moderate those kinds of comments. That's really all there is to it.

What if they wanted to murder me for my words? Would you rationalize that?

falogthered said:
What if they wanted to murder me for my words? Would you rationalize that?

At this point, sure, you're kind of annoying.

dba_afish said:
lmao.

I'm guessing you're from a country where the idea of Freedom of Expression is laughed at on a daily basis.

falogthered said:
What if they wanted to murder me for my words? Would you rationalize that?

That would be a violation of the right to own your body. Not really anything else to say there lol

This clearly isn't going anywhere productive