Colored text is currently aliased to text.

However, we do have tags for text of specific colors:
red text (directly implies text)
orange text (directly implies text)
yellow text (directly implies text)
green text (directly implies text)
teal text (no implications, see topic #45466)
blue text (directly implies text)
purple text (directly implies text)
pink text (directly implies text)

I suggest we unalias colored text, change it’s category to meta, and use it as an umbrella term for all colored text tags, similar to colored line art.

All [color]_text tags would indirectly imply text through colored text instead of directly like as of now.

+1

The bulk update request #8870 is pending approval.

remove alias colored_text (0) -> text (1165604)

Reason: I want to use the colored text tag as an umbrella term.

The bulk update request #8872 is pending approval.

remove implication red_text (2864) -> text (1165604)
remove implication orange_text (749) -> text (1165604)
remove implication yellow_text (1284) -> text (1165604)
remove implication green_text (1757) -> text (1165604)
remove implication blue_text (2613) -> text (1165604)
remove implication purple_text (1225) -> text (1165604)
remove implication pink_text (1567) -> text (1165604)

Reason: Removing the direct implication.

Redundant additional step, when everything including black, white, grey and brown are counted as colors on e621. This would be no more useful than colored fur or colored penis...

ryu_deacon said:
Redundant additional step, when everything including black, white, grey and brown are counted as colors on e621. This would be no more useful than colored fur or colored penis...

They're counted as colors, but not colored, as text usually defaults to black or white and it would be useful to separate things from the default.

I think these tags could be useful when searching for a specific image. +1