The bulk update request #8842 is pending approval.
remove alias thick_legs (0) -> thick_thighs (485539)
create implication thin_legs (9253) -> thin_thighs (11202)
create implication thin_legs (9253) -> thin_calves (10416)
create implication stick_legs (355) -> stick_limbs (272)
create implication stick_arms (265) -> stick_limbs (272)
create implication stick_legs (355) -> stick_thighs (303)
create implication stick_legs (355) -> stick_calves (316)
create implication stick_legs (355) -> micro_legs (780)
create implication stick_thighs (303) -> micro_thighs (913)
create implication stick_calves (316) -> micro_calves (1014)
create implication micro_thighs (913) -> thin_thighs (11202)
create implication micro_calves (1014) -> thin_calves (10416)
create implication micro_legs (780) -> thin_legs (9253)
create implication micro_legs (780) -> micro_thighs (913)
create implication micro_legs (780) -> micro_calves (1014)
create alias hypo_thighs (0) -> micro_thighs (913)
create alias hypo_calves (0) -> micro_calves (1014)
create alias hypo_legs (0) -> micro_legs (780)
Reason: While most female attracted people like thick_thighs, other people, like me prefer thin_thighs. And then there are male attracted people with there own preferences. And what if people have preferences for certain calve widths? I think people like that probable exist. So, tags for that.
But just because a character as thin_thighs that doesn't mean they also have thin_calves, and vice versa. And same goes for thick_calves and thick_thighs. So thick_legs and thin_legs are useful.
Stick_legs are thin by definition, so there's that. And might as well do the implication for stick_limbs while where at it.
You might think stick_thighs and stick_calves are redundant, but looking up stick_calves thick_thighs and thick_calves stick_thighs disproves that idea.
That is my case, please vote. (And I hope I didn't get anything backwards. This is my first one.)
I think it won't let me alias thick_leg to thick_legs until it's unaliased to thick_thighs, so that's annoying. And apparently, I have to make a bunch of aliases a separate BUR.
Edit1: at the suggestion of spe I removed the thin_thighs to thin_lag and thin_calves to thin_leg implications. I also added micro_thighs and micro_calves because the range between thinn_* and stick_* was pretty wide. And if huge_thighs gets to be separate from thick_thighs, then micro_thighs can be separate too.
Edit2: I was going to replace micro_* with noodle_* but someone already made a wiki for noodle_legs and it's a bit different from how I was going to use the micro thighs and calves tags. Please suggest any alternative tag names you have. Not making a micro_legs tag because that might imply an extreme of stubby_legs instead of very thin legs. Stubby_legs also doesn't have a wiki right now, so maybe someone should do that. If there is a forum for that already, feel free to share it.
Edit3: I asked people on forum #418505 for any suggestions that are standard compliment, the only respons told me micro_* was ok. I looked up that hypo_* is the standard antonym of hyper_*, but that prefix doesn't have much use on this site, and is much less known than micro_*, so I am aliasing them together.
However I am concerned that micro might be interpreted as langth in adishin to or instead of width (which is way I didn't have micro_legs in previous edits) like stubby_legs. And I don't have a good answer to the posts with legs that are borderline stick_legs but not quiet. They're essentially stick_legs with an out line so they could count, but I'm not sure. Sorry I don't have an example it's late and that will take some time. So all suggestions are welcomed.
I hope non of this discrergis the mods from approving. I am pretty happy with this, but I am open to feedback. And sorry for the spelling.
Updated