Topic: Rimming implications

The bulk update request #8789 is pending approval.

create implication male_rimming_male (2941) -> male_rimming (1316)
create implication male_rimming_male (2941) -> rimming_male (3090)
create implication male_rimming_female (1447) -> male_rimming (1316)
create implication male_rimming_female (1447) -> rimming_female (656)
create implication female_rimming_female (572) -> female_rimming (726)
create implication female_rimming_female (572) -> rimming_female (656)
create implication female_rimming_male (3119) -> female_rimming (726) # duplicate of implication #64255
create implication female_rimming_male (3119) -> rimming_male (3090)
create implication rimming_female (656) -> rimming (36236)
create implication rimming_male (3090) -> rimming (36236)
create implication female_rimming (726) -> rimming (36236)
create implication male_rimming (1316) -> rimming (36236)
create implication rimming (36236) -> oral (345747) # duplicate of implication #53

Reason: None of these have implications as far as I can tell

.x_rimming_y should be aliased away to avoid more x_verbing_y combo tags. Either to x/y or x_rimming. rimming_female and rimming_male are somewhat ambiguous, whether it's referring to the sex doing the rimming or being rimmed, and would be better as male_rimmed and female_rimmed (along with herm, gynomorph, andromorph, maleherm, intersex, and ambiguous).