The bulk update request #8387 has been rejected.

remove implication clothed_feral (8185) -> clothed (1142735)

Reason: Not every clothed_feral qualifies for clothed:
post #4782443 post #4788571
Common for lingerie_on_feral.

Step 2: implicate clothed_feral -> clothing

EDIT: The bulk update request #8387 (forum #407197) has been rejected by @Waydence.

The bulk update request #8388 has been rejected.

remove implication clothed_feral (8185) -> clothed (1142735)
remove implication clothed_feral (8185) -> feral (615145)
remove implication lingerie_on_feral (889) -> clothed_feral (8185)
remove implication panties_on_feral (4) -> clothed_feral (8185)

Reason: Alternatively, clothed_feral could be changed to clothing_on_feral to be in line with lingerie_on_feral and panties_on_feral.

imply clothing_on_feral -> feral
imply clothing_on_feral -> clothing
imply lingerie_on_feral -> clothing_on_feral
imply panties_on_feral -> clothing_on_feral
alias clothed_feral -> clothing_on_feral

EDIT: The bulk update request #8388 (forum #407198) has been rejected by @Waydence.

waydence said:
The bulk update request #8387 has been rejected.

remove implication clothed_feral (8185) -> clothed (1142735)

Reason: Not every clothed_feral qualifies for clothed:
post #4782443 post #4788571
Common for lingerie_on_feral.

Step 2: implicate clothed_feral -> clothing

How is clothed_feral not considered clothed, but it should imply clothing? If what the feral is wearing is considered clothing, and clothed_feral is applicable, shouldn't clothed be too?

waydence said:
Reason: Not every clothed_feral qualifies for clothed:
post #4782443 post #4788571
Common for lingerie_on_feral.

How are those not clothed? The clothed wiki just says "Images or animations which show characters wearing clothing.", which those sure seem to be

snpthecat said:
How is clothed_feral not considered clothed, but it should imply clothing? If what the feral is wearing is considered clothing, and clothed_feral is applicable, shouldn't clothed be too?

If a character is wearing only legwear, footwear, gloves, certain types of lingerie like garter_belt then they're mostly_nude.

waydence said:
If a character is wearing only legwear, footwear, gloves, certain types of lingerie like garter_belt then they're mostly_nude.

mostly_nude:
A clothed character with a completely unclothed torso and groin.

partially_clothed, maybe. Our clothing tags are confusing.

donovan_dmc said:

maybe we need a "mostly_nude_feral" tag.

versperus said:
partially_clothed, maybe. Our clothing tags are confusing.

That implies clothed

versperus said:
maybe we need a "mostly_nude_feral" tag.

It's a small tag i'm aliasing away here because we don't do such clothing subtags for feral

donovan_dmc said:
A clothed character with a completely unclothed torso and groin.

But mostly_nude doesn't imply clothed? Confusing.

Ah, found topic #28242. Makes sense why.

waydence said:
But mostly_nude doesn't imply clothed? Confusing.

Yes, you're not alone

The bulk update request #8387 (forum #407197) has been rejected by @Waydence.

The bulk update request #8388 (forum #407198) has been rejected by @Waydence.

versperus said:
partially_clothed, maybe. Our clothing tags are confusing.

partially_clothed dosn't have anything to do with how clothed a character is, actually. it's for like when a character has a piece of clothing that's partially removed.