Its my first time posting on the site and so I posted a reference sheet of one of my characters. I honestly thought it was good, and followed all of the uploading guidelines when posting it.

However it was flagged and then later removed and I don't know why? I just wanted to expand where my art was.

And yeah the line art was a bit jittery/wobbly but that's really just because I am unable to draw straight due to a mental illness that causes my hands to shake and make sudden movements when sitting still for long periods of time.

I'm just kind of confused right now, any explanation is appreciated.

https://www.furaffinity.net/view/56789277/ | this is the image I was trying to post, for context.

If you went over to your profile, you can see under your Posts count, there is also the Deleted count.
Your post was removed due to it not meeting minimum artistic quality standards. You can look at topic #23578 to find out what that means.

thegreatwolfgang said:
If you went over to your profile, you can see under your Posts count, there is also the Deleted count.
Your post was removed due to it not meeting minimum artistic quality standards. You can look at topic #23578 to find out what that means.

So I looked through it and I didn't really see anything that pointed out any problems in my art, If its because they only have 2 toes, that is one of the requirements for a nukite character to be lore friendly. Its said on the website for the species.

I'd suggest you also get familiar with our Tagging Rule, else I'll be seeing you next time you upload like that
post #4811215
We require at least 10 non-implied general tags, you supplied just 3 (the ones that are presented on the uploads page), you can review our Tagging Checklist for ideas on tags to use
You sources are also invalid, sources should be an actual submission link to the art, not a profile/gallery link

donovan_dmc said:
I'd suggest you also get familiar with our Tagging Rule, else I'll be seeing you next time you upload like that
post #4811215
We require at least 10 non-implied general tags, you supplied just 3 (the ones that are presented on the uploads page), you can review our Tagging Checklist for ideas on tags to use
You sources are also invalid, sources should be an actual submission link to the art, not a profile/gallery link

If the problem was tagging and not linking correctly then why was it reported as not meeting quality standards? Also the way you said that sounded really condescending at the start.

Like I said I'm new to posting on this sight, and the entire process is very confusing.

I'll be blunt since no one wants to do so. Currently, your art is not good enough in quality to get accepted. This site is a curated imageboard. As such, everything uploaded here is subject to the site's quality standards. If it doesn't meet the site's quality standards, it will (more often than not) get deleted.

I'm not a mod so I don't exactly know their standards, but if I had to explain why:
-The lines are unintentionally wobbly.
-The bright green background is too much of a color contrast with the darker-colored character. It's eye-straining.
-The thin yellow stripes on the character need more curve to show depth and to avoid making the body parts appear flat. You did okay with the stripe on the neck, do that for the thighs and tail.
-One of the hands is bigger than the other.

Most of this can be fixed by just practicing and making small adjustments. Keep at it and soon enough, it will meet the quality standards in the future.

waba said:
I'll be blunt since no one wants to do so. Currently, your art is not good enough in quality to get accepted. This site is a curated imageboard. As such, everything uploaded here is subject to the site's quality standards. If it doesn't meet the site's quality standards, it will (more often than not) get deleted.

I'm not a mod so I don't exactly know their standards, but if I had to explain why:
-The lines are unintentionally wobbly.
-The bright green background is too much of a color contrast with the darker-colored character. It's eye-straining.
-The thin yellow stripes on the character need more curve to show depth and to avoid making the body parts appear flat. You did okay with the stripe on the neck, do that for the thighs and tail.
-One of the hands is bigger than the other.

Most of this can be fixed by just practicing and making small adjustments. Keep at it and soon enough, it will meet the quality standards in the future.

https://e621.net/posts/4812529? this is literally a trace over of gojo from jjk, posted around the time that I posted my art, except this is still up and my completely original art is taken down. I understand if its supposed to be a curated imageboard, but the images on it completely counteract this.

h06urs said:
https://e621.net/posts/4812529? this is literally a trace over of gojo from jjk, posted around the time that I posted my art, except this is still up and my completely original art is taken down. I understand if its supposed to be a curated imageboard, but the images on it completely counteract this.

It's pending approval and hasn't yet been accepted. It probably won't be.

regsmutt said:
It's pending approval and hasn't yet been accepted. It probably won't be.

I'm just saying that my art was flagged the day of posting and it was art, whereas that is just a traced image.

Also you're a zoophile, your statements are invalid.

h06urs said:
I'm just saying that my art was flagged the day of posting and it was art, whereas that is just a traced image.

Also you're a zoophile, your statements are invalid.

It's only been two days. Give it time and that image should be removed too.

h06urs said:
I'm just saying that my art was flagged the day of posting and it was art, whereas that is just a traced image.

Also you're a zoophile, your statements are invalid.

What @regsmutt said is true. All posts will need to be reviewed by an approver before they get accepted.
Your post being flagged does not make it any less likely to be deleted than if it was not flagged in the first place.

Also, take a moment to read the Code of Conduct before making statements like that.

h06urs said:
I'm just saying that my art was flagged the day of posting and it was art, whereas that is just a traced image.

Also you're a zoophile, your statements are invalid.

Hm, not sure you'll be around for long with this behavior.

thegreatwolfgang said:
What @regsmutt said is true. All posts will need to be reviewed by an approver before they get accepted.
Your post being flagged does not make it any less likely to be deleted than if it was not flagged in the first place.

Also, take a moment to read the Code of Conduct before making statements like that.

Beastiality has been a crime since the 1950's, And zoophiles like him found a way to get around that illegality while still being able to do the disgusting act. Its terrible, disgusting, and needs to be wiped from the internet, as well as loli and shota stuff. Its all disgusting and actively liking it and seeing no problem in liking it is even worse. It doesnt matter if the dog can speak english, thats still a dog your wanking off too, just like how it may be a 300 year old elf lady, but they still look like and act like a toddler. Ban me for all I care, the fact that you think shit like that is ok makes me sick.

regsmutt said:
Hm, not sure you'll be around for long with this behavior.

Go to a therapist, or better yet, tell your fucking parents that you jerk off to animals fucking on the internet. see how they react. its disgusting and immoral.

h06urs said:
-snip-

don't let the door hit you.

dba_afish said:
don't let the door hit you.

Stop acting like the protagonist in a generic anime and realize that this stuff is wrong

h06urs said:
Stop acting like the protagonist in a generic anime and realize that this stuff is wrong

lmao.

h06urs said:
Go to a therapist, or better yet, tell your fucking parents that you jerk off to animals fucking on the internet. see how they react. its disgusting and immoral.

Lol, lmao even.

regsmutt said:
Lol, lmao even.

You can say lol and lmao all you want, but it isn't going to change the fact that beastiality and zoophilia and any thing in that sense is heavily looked down upon and labeled as disgusting. This alone should tell you that its wrong.

People like you should be a case study on the effects of the internet on the brain, and how it causes leaps in logic to justify the most heinous actions.

h06urs said:
People like you should be a case study on the effects of the internet on the brain, and how it causes leaps in logic to justify the most heinous actions.

Why did you even want to post here, then?

year_of_the_chux said:
Why did you even want to post here, then?

My friend has all their nukite art here, and before this I thought that most people here had the same opinion, that porn of literal non anthro animals was wrong. but apparently I was vastly wrong on that.

h06urs said:
People like you should be a case study on the effects of the internet on the brain, and how it causes leaps in logic to justify the most heinous actions.

it's alright, mate, you can take it easy, maybe the furry community just isn't for you. if you want on the bus back to Normieville, 've got one leaving every half-hour, you can go ahead an kinkshame much as you want when you get there.

h06urs said:
You can say lol and lmao all you want, but it isn't going to change the fact that beastiality and zoophilia and any thing in that sense is heavily looked down upon and labeled as disgusting. This alone should tell you that its wrong.

Got any more monologs for us?

honestly, if everything is equal, I feel like sexualizing weapons would be a bit worse on the scale of gross things, no? those things that killed hundreds of thousands of civilians in August of 1945. also, like animals, nuclear weapons cannot consent to sexual activity.

Let's not do this
Show's over, everyone go home