The tag implication #63706 high_heels_only -> shoes_only has been rejected.
Reason: High-heels are a type of shoe.
EDIT: The tag implication high_heels_only -> shoes_only (forum #407042) has been rejected by @Mediocracy.
Updated by auto moderator
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #63706 high_heels_only -> shoes_only has been rejected.
Reason: High-heels are a type of shoe.
EDIT: The tag implication high_heels_only -> shoes_only (forum #407042) has been rejected by @Mediocracy.
Updated by auto moderator
high_heels doesn't imply shoes because it can also apply to boots, which aren't considered shoes on here.
The bulk update request #8367 is active.
create implication high_heels_only (501) -> high_heels (57739)
create implication high_heels_only (501) -> footwear_only (8638)
Reason: high heels imply footwear, so the same goes for high heels only
EDIT: The bulk update request #8367 (forum #407050) has been approved by @furrypickle.
Updated by auto moderator
The tag implication high_heels_only -> shoes_only (forum #407042) has been rejected by @Mediocracy.
The bulk update request #8367 (forum #407050) has been approved by @furrypickle.