The bulk update request #8158 is active.

remove implication bodysuit (15735) -> clothing (2060156)
remove implication cock_warmer (237) -> clothing (2060156)
remove implication babydoll (846) -> clothing (2060156)
create implication nightgown (2828) -> clothing (2060156)
remove implication basque (84) -> clothing (2060156)
remove implication tutu (593) -> clothing (2060156)

Reason: Clothing is implied through another implication

EDIT: The bulk update request #8158 (forum #405473) has been approved by @slyroon.

snpthecat said:
The bulk update request #8158 is active.

remove implication bodysuit (15735) -> clothing (2060156)
remove implication cock_warmer (237) -> clothing (2060156)
remove implication babydoll (846) -> clothing (2060156)
create implication nightgown (2828) -> clothing (2060156)
remove implication basque (84) -> clothing (2060156)
remove implication tutu (593) -> clothing (2060156)

Reason: Clothing is implied through another implication

nightgown doesn't imply clothing? Oh sorry, misread that. It's CREATING one, not removing.
What about dancewear?
Should that imply clothing?

The bulk update request #8158 (forum #405473) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #8326 is active.

create implication dancewear (1285) -> clothing (2060156)

Reason: Sure, and it ends in -wear so it follows the trend of -wear tags being clothing
Opinions on athletic wear and sportswear? The latter has batting helmet implied to it, and helmets aren't clothing until worn.

EDIT: The bulk update request #8326 (forum #406645) has been approved by @scaliespe.

The bulk update request #8326 (forum #406645) has been approved by @scaliespe.