Topic: Swimsuit colors BUR

The bulk update request #8128 is pending approval.

Reason: Part one - colors

The bulk update request #8129 is pending approval.

create implication striped_one-piece_swimsuit (10) -> one-piece_swimsuit (23083)
create implication spotted_one-piece_swimsuit (3) -> one-piece_swimsuit (23083)
create implication flag_one-piece_swimsuit (1) -> one-piece_swimsuit (23083)
create implication pride_color_one-piece_swimsuit (7) -> one-piece_swimsuit (23083)
create implication pattern_one-piece_swimsuit (5) -> one-piece_swimsuit (23083)
create implication floral_one-piece_swimsuit (3) -> one-piece_swimsuit (23083)
create implication gold_one-piece_swimsuit (3) -> one-piece_swimsuit (23083)

Reason: Part 2 - patterns

I've left out "two tone" and "multicolored" because there's been some controversy over whether those terms even need to be kept around at all, so I'd like for some people to weigh in on that. "Monotone", oddly enough, is already aliased, as is "print."

Oh, also, curious if you have thoughts on "floral" vs. "floral print" wording. "Floral_print" is being used for most things, which makes sense to me because "floral" sounds like it's actually made of flowers. You know, like in Fantasia:

post #218114

"Floral_bra" is being used for that, but "floral_bikini" is just being used as an alternate wording for "floral_print_bikini", so that needs a ruling and either an alias or a cleanup.

errorist said:
The bulk update request #8128 is pending approval.

create implication red_one-piece_swimsuit (163) -> one-piece_swimsuit (23083)
create implication orange_one-piece_swimsuit (4) -> one-piece_swimsuit (23083)
create implication yellow_one-piece_swimsuit (27) -> one-piece_swimsuit (23083)
create implication green_one-piece_swimsuit (42) -> one-piece_swimsuit (23083)
create implication teal_one-piece_swimsuit (6) -> one-piece_swimsuit (23083)
create implication blue_one-piece_swimsuit (162) -> one-piece_swimsuit (23083)
create implication purple_one-piece_swimsuit (80) -> one-piece_swimsuit (23083)
create implication black_one-piece_swimsuit (120) -> one-piece_swimsuit (23083)
create implication white_one-piece_swimsuit (62) -> one-piece_swimsuit (23083)
create implication grey_one-piece_swimsuit (3) -> one-piece_swimsuit (23083)
create implication brown_one-piece_swimsuit (1) -> one-piece_swimsuit (23083)
create implication pink_one-piece_swimsuit (45) -> one-piece_swimsuit (23083)
create implication gold_one-piece_swimsuit (3) -> one-piece_swimsuit (23083)

Reason: Part one - colors

Huh, what's Versperus's opposition to this and other BURs lately?

snpthecat said:
Huh, what's Versperus's opposition to this and other BURs lately?

He doesn't like tagging colors for clothing sub-types, I think. Arguably, this could be covered just as well by color_swimwear + one-piece_swimsuit, but we do already have all the implications set up for bikini, so...

scaliespe said:
He doesn't like tagging colors for clothing sub-types, I think. Arguably, this could be covered just as well by color_swimwear + one-piece_swimsuit, but we do already have all the implications set up for bikini, so...

Understandable. Aliasing away the compound modifer-subtags will be a gargantuan effort given they're well entrenched in the implication trees

Color implication chains have massive bloat; bloat, I believe, should be reserved for characters rather than clothing and items inside the posts. We've been getting hyper-specific and making implication chains for tags that both go completely ignored and get us closer to hitting the 2000 tags on a post limit.