The bulk update request #8042 has been rejected.

create alias sex_reassignment_surgery (0) -> gender_reassignment_surgery (4)
create alias accidental_sex_reassignment_surgery (0) -> accidental_gender_reassignment_surgery (0)

Reason: These appear to be used pretty much interchangeably. The majority of posts tagged with one are tagged with the other.
idk which way the alias should go, but I think it should be consolidated into one tag.

EDIT: The bulk update request #8042 (forum #404586) has been rejected by @scaliespe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender-affirming_surgery#Terminology

Gender-affirming surgery is known by numerous other names, including gender-affirmation surgery, sex reassignment surgery, gender reassignment surgery, and gender confirmation surgery.

The Wikipedia article is titled Gender-affirming surgery, so I suggest aliasing the other names to that

The bulk update request #8046 is active.

create alias sex_reassignment_surgery (0) -> gender-affirming_surgery (17)
create alias accidental_sex_reassignment_surgery (0) -> accidental_gender-affirming_surgery (2)
create alias gender_reassignment_surgery (4) -> gender-affirming_surgery (17)
create alias accidental_gender_reassignment_surgery (0) -> accidental_gender-affirming_surgery (2)

Reason:

gattonero2001 said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender-affirming_surgery#Terminology

The Wikipedia article is titled Gender-affirming surgery, so I suggest aliasing the other names to that

Creating a separate BUR so democracy can decide lol

EDIT: The bulk update request #8046 (forum #404602) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

If it was accidental (and they didn't want to change), it wouldn't be particularly gender-affirming would it? post #140633

snpthecat said:
If it was accidental (and they didn't want to change), it wouldn't be particularly gender-affirming would it? post #140633

yeah, it's really only gender affirming if their, y'know, gender is being affirmed.

I-- I don't know what direction we sould go with this one. I feel like sex_reassignment_surgery is technically the most neutral and accurate term but it's kinda fallen out of use... if we wanted to go really colloquial we could call it bottom_surgery, I feel like that's a pretty well-known term, but at the same time...

Also a ton of posts under sex reassignment surgery don't feel very twys; it's either lore, a passing comment, or just scars from the surgery

hot take: whatever gender surgery tag we go for should imply surgical_operation if we don't want people to tag posts that are just post-op scars or simple acknowledgements that a character in a pic earned their dick

The bulk update request #8046 (forum #404602) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #8048 is pending approval.

create implication accidental_gender-affirming_surgery (2) -> gender-affirming_surgery (17)
create implication gender-affirming_surgery (17) -> surgical_operation (209)

Reason: Even if it's accidental, it still is the surgery.
Also implying surgical operation as suggested above

If we're going with this name, better set up the appropriate implications

dirtyderg said:
The bulk update request #8042 has been rejected.

create alias sex_reassignment_surgery (0) -> gender_reassignment_surgery (4)
create alias accidental_sex_reassignment_surgery (0) -> accidental_gender_reassignment_surgery (0)

Reason: These appear to be used pretty much interchangeably. The majority of posts tagged with one are tagged with the other.
idk which way the alias should go, but I think it should be consolidated into one tag.

Can be rejected since they're all aliased

The bulk update request #8042 (forum #404586) has been rejected by @scaliespe.

snpthecat said:
If it was accidental (and they didn't want to change), it wouldn't be particularly gender-affirming would it? post #140633

This is a valid point. This might not have been the best name. 🤔

EDIT: The bulk update request #8046 (forum #404602) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

With this being approved, I just want to bring some attention to the other 'accidental' BUR I made

snpthecat said:
If it was accidental (and they didn't want to change), it wouldn't be particularly gender-affirming would it? post #140633

Or forced upon them, in which case it could be considered gender-denying surgery despite looking the same from a TWYS standpoint.

Seems to me this is an example of why tag names in general should not contain overtly subjective elements -- we just aren't aiming to tag those (even in lore tags, really), and it tends to produce incorrect or even absurd implications. Being clinical is probably more correct even if we have to use outdated language in order to do so.