So fantasy_penis is currently aliased away into unusual_penis and I'm not sure this is the best choice. Currently unusual_penis is very mistagged- it's on images that have anything from just extra ridges and textured heads to simply knotted humanoid penises, none of which seems to meet the spirit of a tag that includes "it typically has to hardly looks like a penis at all" in its description.
It also makes the utility of the tag for blacklisting and searching poor because like. These
post #4666036 post #4544740
are clearly a different level of unusual than these:
post #4641858 post #4572882

The tag animal_penis ALSO has an issue getting tagged on images of fantasy creatures without their penises significantly resembling a real animal's. There's a lof of just generic tapering_penises like this:
post #4360720

I think there's some value in a tag to catch things that are not standard humanoid dicks, and aren't identifiable animal penises either, but also aren't particularly unusual. Stuff like this being tagged both animal_penis and unusual_penis is silly:
post #3955152 post #3850696 post #3188493

The bulk update request #7510 is pending approval.

remove alias fantasy_penis (0) -> unusual_penis (5182)

Reason: with that being said...

part 2: fantasy_penis -> penis

regsmutt said:
The tag animal_penis ALSO has an issue getting tagged on images of fantasy creatures without their penises significantly resembling a real animal's. There's a lof of just generic tapering_penises like this:
post #4360720

FWIW, that "Erected state" variant in quite similar to a cetacean_penis, so animal_penis would be applicable to that case. "Erected state 2.0" is the same, but with added barbs or protrusions. So I would argue animal_penis is valid on that post.

But yes, I have also seen posts being tagged animal_penis for simply having a non-humanoid penis, regardless of it looking like a real animal's penis, so the general point is valid.

watsit said:
FWIW, that "Erected state" variant in quite similar to a cetacean_penis, so animal_penis would be applicable to that case. "Erected state 2.0" is the same, but with added barbs or protrusions. So I would argue animal_penis is valid on that post.

But yes, I have also seen posts being tagged animal_penis for simply having a non-humanoid penis, regardless of it looking like a real animal's penis, so the general point is valid.

The line between cetacean_penis and just a thick tapering_penis has always been blurry. This instance also resembles things tagged as marsupial penises. But I'll leave the fussing over the specifics of cetacean vs tapering to the people who like cetacean penises.