This mostly comes from reviewing the rules against creepy comments on e621. Yes, creepy comments suck. But did they really have to give "Fine addition to my collection for erection" as an example? I mean, come on now. You're crossing the line twice with that one.

Have you ever had one that was audacious enough to make you chuckle a bit at its absurdity/humor?

Site rules and expectations being what they are, I might suggest you spoiler any comments that you think might go a little too far. ([spoiler]text[/spoiler])

comment #3277985

comment #296694

comment #3

comment #7464484
comment #7747979

watsit said:
comment #3

Oh that's a really old comment.

comment #5013702

coffeeco said:
Oh that's a really old comment.

It in fact seems to be the oldest intact comment since 1 and 2 don't work

Just found one in recent tickets.
comment #8153879

comment #788625 and so forth

regsmutt said:
Just found one in recent tickets.
comment #8153879

pero...

regsmutt said:
Just found one in recent tickets.
comment #8153879

Hold up, let him cook.

snake-girl said:
comment #5013702

This one is really good

post #3214719

The chain of comments here.

The funniest creepy comment you have ever seen? It wasn't here but on the sister website Rule34 (XXX Server) Where a dude said that he wished that bluey was real and he would play all kind of "Games" with her and bingo, The comment was deleted by the moderators but the screenshot of it is frequently shared online

mta_2_train said:
The funniest creepy comment you have ever seen? It wasn't here but on the sister website Rule34 (XXX Server) Where a dude said that he wished that bluey was real and he would play all kind of "Games" with her and bingo, The comment was deleted by the moderators but the screenshot of it is frequently shared online

"sister website"?

dba_afish said:
"sister website"?

Yea, Because Rule34 XXX has almost the same layout as E621, Being the core difference that one is an ugly shade of green and one is an ugly shade of blue
I know that they both use the same booru source code but it was just an observation

watsit said:
comment #3

sounds about right.

yetanothertemp said:
post #3214719

The chain of comments here.

i adore that the one guy edited all their comments to hide what they said, only for all of them to be preserved by the replies anyways, very good schadenfreude

mta_2_train said:
I know that they both use the same booru source code

We don't

rule34.xxx is based off of gelbooru
we're based off of danbooru

Gelbooru is php
Danbooru is ruby
they are very different

Also, having a similar layout doesn't make it a "sister site", that makes it sound like we run or are related to that site when we have nothing to do with them
This layout is just common among boorus in general, the other common layout is the one derpibooru uses, philomena

donovan_dmc said:
We don't

rule34.xxx is based off of gelbooru
we're based off of danbooru

Gelbooru is php
Danbooru is ruby
they are very different

Also, having a similar layout doesn't make it a "sister site", that makes it sound like we run or are related to that site when we have nothing to do with them
This layout is just common among boorus in general, the other common layout is the one derpibooru uses, philomena

That makes sense

donovan_dmc said:
We don't

rule34.xxx is based off of gelbooru
we're based off of danbooru

Gelbooru is php
Danbooru is ruby
they are very different

Also, having a similar layout doesn't make it a "sister site", that makes it sound like we run or are related to that site when we have nothing to do with them
This layout is just common among boorus in general, the other common layout is the one derpibooru uses, philomena

perhaps they are stepsister sites