Implicating bovine_penis → animal_genitalia
Link to implication

Reason:

penis

Related implications:

• bovine_penis -> animal_genitalia (OP approved), penis (approved)
• bovine_pussy -> animal_genitalia (approved), pussy (approved)
• cetacean_penis -> animal_genitalia (approved), penis (approved)
• cervine_penis -> animal_genitalia (approved), penis (approved)
• echidna_penis -> animal_genitalia (approved), penis (approved)
• feline_pussy -> animal_genitalia (approved), pussy (approved)
• hemipenes -> animal_genitalia (not sure about this one) (pending)
• marsupial_penis -> animal_genitalia (approved), penis (approved)
• porcine_penis -> animal_genitalia (approved), penis (approved)
• turtlecock -> animal_genitalia - Edit: Will likely use turtle_penis instead
• turtle_penis -> animal_genitalia (approved), penis (approved)
• Alias turtlecock -> turtle_penis (approved)
• ursine_penis -> animal_genitalia (or bear_penis, see forum #147148)
• Implication: ursine_penis -> penis (approved), animal_genitalia (approved)
• Alias: bear_penis -> ursine_penis (approved)

Edit: Added a few more and alphabetized it for readability.

Edit 4/10:

• Implication: knotted_horsecock -> horsecock (approved)
• Implication: knotted_horsecock -> knot (approved)

Processed implications and 1 alias as listed above. The following additional changes have been made:

• Moved dual_penis alias from hemipenes -> multi_penis
• Moved dual_cock alias from diphallism -> multi_penis
• Moved penis implication from multi_cock -> multi_penis
• Moved diphallism, hemipenes implications from multi_cock -> multi_penis
• Moved a number of aliases from multi_cock -> multi_penis
• Alias: diphalism -> diphallism now approved - Common spelling mistake
• Alias: cock_tail -> tail_cock now approved - Grouping with the rest.
• Alias: cocksleeve -> cock_sleeve now approved
• Implication erection -> aroused denied.
• While this may technically be true, I'm not convinced that every post with an erection needs to imply aroused. I'm also not convinced that we need the aroused tag, but if kept it should probably be limited to cases where the character is noticably or extremely aroused, probably showing multiple signs of arousal beyond just an erection.

Pending:

• hemipenes -> animal_genitalia

I'm not sure about this tag in general, since it tends to be used synonymously with diphallism. But if we are keeping the animal genitalia definition, I see no reason why we can't use this

• ursine_penis/bear_penis -> animal_genitalia, penis

There was some discussion about this in forum #147148, but I'm not sure where to go with this one. On one hand, ursine is aliased to bear and this would be slightly more obvious what the tag belongs to. On the other hand, it's possible (but probably unlikely) that bear_penis might be interpreted as "to bear one's penis" or something similar. The tag is barely used though either way.

• Alias: horsecock -> horse_penis
• Alias: tail_cock -> tail_penis

This wasn't part of the original list, but I wanted to bring this up for discussion. I know that some may still be more fond of using horsecock and tail_cock (to a lesser degree), but this change would eliminate one of the last few anatomy-related *cock* tags.

parasprite said:
This wasn't part of the original list, but I wanted to bring this up for discussion. I know that some may still be more fond of using horsecock and tail_cock (to a lesser degree), but this change would eliminate one of the last few anatomy-related *cock* tags.

I've always loved the way horsecock sounds, but if we're going to alias it to something else I think equine_penis would be a better target. Horses, zebras and donkeys all have the same kind of penises. Probably more animals that I'm not thinking of right now too.

Tuvalu said:
I've always loved the way horsecock sounds, but if we're going to alias it to something else I think equine_penis would be a better target. Horses, zebras and donkeys all have the same kind of penises. Probably more animals that I'm not thinking of right now too.

+1 for equine_penis over horse_penis (though I'm personally for keeping horsecock :P )

would knotted_horsecock fall into this category somewhere?

i'd link to the tags wiki page but i don't know how to link tags.

scratch that, it doesn't have a wiki page at all yet theres at least 50+ pics with tagged with knotted_horsecock.

treos said:
would knotted_horsecock fall into this category somewhere?

i'd link to the tags wiki page but i don't know how to link tags.

scratch that, it doesn't have a wiki page at all yet theres at least 50+ pics with tagged with knotted_horsecock.

Put two { } or [ ] on either side of a tag to make it link to it's wiki page, or posts tagged with it.

Knotted_horsecock should stay, imo.
Sad to see horsecock go, but +1 for equine_penis.

treos said:
would knotted_horsecock fall into this category somewhere?

i'd link to the tags wiki page but i don't know how to link tags.

scratch that, it doesn't have a wiki page at all yet theres at least 50+ pics with tagged with knotted_horsecock.

Oh yeah, I forgot that one was a thing. Does anybody see any problem with doing this?

• Implication: knotted_horsecock -> horsecock
• Implication: knotted_horsecock -> knot

parasprite said:
Oh yeah, I forgot that one was a thing. Does anybody see any problem with doing this?

• Implication: knotted_horsecock -> horsecock
• Implication: knotted_horsecock -> knot

Nope, looks fine.

Seems alright to me.

Peekaboo said:
Put two { } or [ ] on either side of a tag to make it link to it's wiki page, or posts tagged with it.

ah, ok, thanks

Alright, I've made the following changes:

• Implication: knotted_horsecock -> horsecock(approved)
• Implication: knotted_horsecock -> knot (approved)
• Implication: ursine_penis -> penis (approved), animal_genitalia (approved)
• Alias: bear_penis -> ursine_penis (now approved)

Pending:

• horsecock -> equine_penis

I'm going to deny this one for now and leave horsecock as-is. It doesn't really seem as if anybodh really wanted to change it, but were reluctantly prefering equine_penis over the other non-horsecock choices. I also don't think there has been any problems from using the name horsecock that equine_penis would actually solve by itself.

I think that being consistent for the more obscure tags (e.g., cock_head -> penis_head) is probably a higher priority for us at this point.

---

• hemipenes -> animal_genitalia

I'm still a bit conflicted by this one but I have another idea that may help.

Hemipenes are a specific type of genitalia seen in lizards/snakes. They can vary in shape from "a penis split in half" to "split penis head" to "something that barely looks like a penis at all". However, in practice I've only ever seen the tag used for something that looks like 2 penises.

Which is fine by itself, however it is often confused with diphallism, a term that simply refers to having two penises. We can clean it up every now and then, but I'd like to minimize that if possible.

It almost looks to me like we are splitting the meanings "2 penises" and "2 penises that shouldn't be tagged diphallism". Look at it like this and it becomes a bit more understandable why the split in usage is so confusing for people.

Here's another idea I have which may help this:

• multi_penis - 2 or more penises
• diphallism - A tag that means "2_penises"
• hemipenes (-> animal_genitalia) - A specific subtype of "2_penises" seen in snakes/lizards

The superficial difference between the two here is one gets tagged as animal genitalia whereas the other doesn't. This would reinforce usage more strongly than trying to split them up completely would. (it also makes cleanup easier)

parasprite said:

• multi_penis - 2 or more penises
• diphallism - A tag that means "2_penises"
• hemipenes (-> animal_genitalia) - A specific subtype of "2_penises" seen in snakes/lizards

If that must be done, then how about renaming (aliasing) diphallism to 2_penis? That'd be more descriptive, and diphallia generally only refers to the medical condition.