Topic: Belly Implications

The bulk update request #6415 is pending approval.

create implication potbelly (2534) -> belly (330052)
create implication bloated (6447) -> belly (330052)
create implication musclegut (44247) -> belly (330052)
create implication belly_jiggle (686) -> belly (330052)
create implication belly_overhang (9748) -> belly (330052)
create implication hanging_belly (523) -> belly (330052)
create implication belly_hat (9) -> belly (330052)
create implication belly_hump (0) -> big_belly (144396)
create implication veiny_belly (391) -> belly (330052)
create implication veiny_belly (391) -> vein (252555)
create implication sloshing_belly (3015) -> belly (330052)
create implication sloshing_belly (3015) -> slosh (3557)
create implication belly_inflation (6489) -> belly (330052)
create implication belly_smother (247) -> belly (330052)
create implication belly_smother (247) -> smothering (8490)
create implication hyper_pregnancy (4840) -> huge_belly (38672)
create implication resting_on_belly (2382) -> huge_belly (38672)
create implication belly_on_ground (1192) -> belly (330052)
create implication belly_kiss (183) -> kissing (81537)
create implication belly_lick (468) -> licking (168532)
create implication belly_rub (3147) -> rubbing (4142)

Reason: A bunch of belly-related implications, this should help with the fact that a lot of people forget to tag it in their posts.

What's the difference between potbelly and belly, tagging wise?

anicebee said:
create implication belly_hump (62) -> big_belly (87950)

belly_hump should probably be renamed. "Hump" can refer to a protrusion, making it the same as big_belly, or a character grinding their crotch (bulge, penis, or pussy) against a belly of any size as a form of sex. The wiki says it's for masturbation of one's penis against their own belly. All rather different meanings.

anicebee said:
create implication musclegut (29631) -> belly (213918)

This seems like it could also apply to a character who's only seen from the chest up, having visible moobs and somewhat muscular arms without the belly in frame.

anicebee said:
create implication resting_on_belly (748) -> huge_belly (5153)
create implication belly_on_ground (261) -> belly (213918)

These seem easy for misinterpreting as a character simply lying on_front, where the belly itself doesn't have to be huge or directly visible.

cloudpie said:
What's the difference between potbelly and belly, tagging wise?

potbelly is meant for round, protruding bellies with no rolls, I believe.

create implication hyper_pregnancy (2693) -> huge_belly (5244)
This should imply hyper_belly rather than huge_belly. Hyper -> hyper. However, I have to wonder if it would be possible to depict hyper pregnancy without a belly at all... Maybe something like eggs being stored in an arthropod_abdomen or something similar to that. I'm not sure.

scaliespe said:
create implication hyper_pregnancy (2693) -> huge_belly (5244)
This should imply hyper_belly rather than huge_belly. Hyper -> hyper. However, I have to wonder if it would be possible to depict hyper pregnancy without a belly at all... Maybe something like eggs being stored in an arthropod_abdomen or something similar to that. I'm not sure.

The other problem with hyper pregnancy is that there are a lot of cases where the belly doesn't really qualify for the hyper belly tag, unless you're using an unhelpfully broad definition of "hyper" which is unnecessary to use, because we have the huge belly tag now.

Cases in point

post #2457195 post #4408618 post #3390665

anicebee said:
imply belly_hat -> belly

belly on head is a better phrased and less ambiguous tag than "belly hat", and it works as a reversal of head on belly.

scaliespe said:
create implication hyper_pregnancy (2693) -> huge_belly (5244)
This should imply hyper_belly rather than huge_belly. Hyper -> hyper. However, I have to wonder if it would be possible to depict hyper pregnancy without a belly at all... Maybe something like eggs being stored in an arthropod_abdomen or something similar to that. I'm not sure.

maplebytes said:
The other problem with hyper pregnancy is that there are a lot of cases where the belly doesn't really qualify for the hyper belly tag, unless you're using an unhelpfully broad definition of "hyper" which is unnecessary to use, because we have the huge belly tag now.

also, you know, weird anatomies. a womb can be several places where it ought not be.

actually, thinking about this, I wonder if pregnant_belly really should have been aliased away. it's probably not super useful as a tag but at the same time I'm not sure if it was totally useless enough to warrant an alias.