Topic: Tag alias: No_toes -> toeless_feet

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

sipothac said:
alias both to featureless_feet

Agreed, though looking at that tag I feel the current definition is a bit too broad?

"This applies both to characters that have somewhat normally-shaped feet just without toes, as well as characters who's legs end in a point or just kind of end at the shin."

Should these really be tagged as the same thing?

post #1330500 post #1296457

pleaseletmein said:
Agreed, though looking at that tag I feel the current definition is a bit too broad?

"This applies both to characters that have somewhat normally-shaped feet just without toes, as well as characters who's legs end in a point or just kind of end at the shin."

Should these really be tagged as the same thing?

post #1330500 post #1296457

yeah, I believe that featureless_legs would be better applied to the two cases other than the Sonic-style bean-foot deal that most of this tag's population falls into.

There are characters that aren't supposed to have toes, and also characters merely drawn without them. Those are two different facts that don't have a 1:1 relationship so shouldn't each have its own tag? Imagine a beetle or crab. Its legs have joints, might have spurs, maybe bristles or tufts... no toes, "feet" questionably defined, not featureless legs. Maybe simple_feet for when it's an anatomical fact and featureless_feet for when it's a stylized character?

  • 1