Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The bulk update request #6221 is pending approval.
create implication teal_pubes (13) -> pubes (146206)
create implication two_tone_pubes (29) -> multicolored_pubes (26)
create implication rainbow_pubes (39) -> multicolored_pubes (26)
create implication multicolored_pubes (26) -> pubes (146206)
Reason: teal pubes must've gotten missed in the tealpocalypse a little while ago, the various multicolored ones are also missing.
Downvoting this only for including two tone/rainbow/etc. We don't need numbered color tags for every little thing out there.
donovan_dmc said:
Downvoting this only for including two tone/rainbow/etc. We don't need numbered color tags for every little thing out there.
I would honestly be fine with aliasing every two_tone_* tag to multicolored_* bc I don't think they provide that much utility, but do I think the rainbow_* tags are helpful.
upvoted because teal_pubes -> pubes. Unsure about if it's really necessary to implicate rainbow_pubes to multicolored_pubes or just rainbow pubes -> pubes. I just don't know if this is the best way to do that. Same for two_tone. why not just implicate pubes?
hjfduitloxtrds said:
Unsure about if it's really necessary to implicate rainbow_pubes to multicolored_pubes or just rainbow pubes -> pubes. I just don't know if this is the best way to do that. Same for two_tone. why not just implicate pubes?
Because that's how all other two_tone_* and rainbow_* tags currently work. I agree two_tone_* and multicolored_* should probably be overhauled at some point, but this BUR is consistent with how they're currently done.
cloudpie said:
Because that's how all other two_tone_* and rainbow_* tags currently work. I agree two_tone_* and multicolored_* should probably be overhauled at some point, but this BUR is consistent with how they're currently done.
hmm good point. +1 for consistency. I like consistency.
The tag really should be pubic_hair: topic #39046.
