Implicating Dragon_wings → Wings
Link to implication
Reason:
Updated by user 59725
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Implicating Dragon_wings → Wings
Link to implication
Updated by user 59725
How do dragon_wings differ from bat_wings? I'm not sure if there's any noticeable difference, expect that one is tagged for dragons and another for bats and demons.
Maybe both could be aliased to membranous_wings and then implicated to wings?
Updated by anonymous
Dragon wings can actually come in a whole variety of forms, so the tag itself should be aliased to wings, not any particular type.
Updated by anonymous
Genjar said:
How do dragon_wings differ from bat_wings? I'm not sure if there's any noticeable difference, expect that one is tagged for dragons and another for bats and demons.Maybe both could be aliased to membranous_wings and then implicated to wings?
They belong on a dragon, which may or may not look like a bat.
To be honest, I find dragon_wings to be one of the more vague types of tags.
Furrin_Gok said:
Dragon wings can actually come in a whole variety of forms, so the tag itself should be aliased to wings, not any particular type.
I would be okay with this. To me tagging dragon_wings is about as useful as tagging dragon_feet, demon_feet, or gryphon_genitals. They are all imaginary creatures and don't really have a consistent form.
Updated by anonymous
While it's true that there's many kinds of dragon wings, I've only seen it tagged for one specific type.
I think it could be safely aliased to membranous_wings, but aliasing it to wings would be fine by me too.
Updated by anonymous
This tag is no longer in use, so I'm going to go ahead and deny this one.
Updated by anonymous