The bulk update request #6057 is pending approval.
create implication black_bikini_bottom (313) -> black_bikini (2656)
create implication blue_bikini_bottom (160) -> blue_bikini (1328)
create implication brown_bikini_bottom (0) -> brown_bikini (47)
create implication green_bikini_bottom (117) -> green_bikini (896)
create implication grey_bikini_bottom (4) -> grey_bikini (46)
create implication orange_bikini_bottom (40) -> orange_bikini (259)
create implication pink_bikini_bottom (134) -> pink_bikini (1008)
create implication purple_bikini_bottom (124) -> purple_bikini (866)
create implication red_bikini_bottom (146) -> red_bikini (1437)
create implication tan_bikini_bottom (4) -> tan_bikini (15)
create implication teal_bikini_bottom (4) -> teal_bikini (34)
create implication white_bikini_bottom (92) -> white_bikini (841)
create implication yellow_bikini_bottom (74) -> yellow_bikini (804)
create implication rainbow_bikini_bottom (0) -> rainbow_bikini (30)
create implication translucent_bikini_bottom (5) -> translucent_bikini (122)
create implication multicolored_bikini_bottom (6) -> multicolored_bikini (164)
create implication multi_tone_bikini_bottom (0) -> multi_tone_bikini (0)
Reason: Extension of BUR #6055, exclusively dealing with "<color>_bikini_bottom -> <color>_bikini".
I hope it's obvious why these implications should exist.
I left out "monotone_bikini_bottom -> monotone_bikini" and "two_tone_bikini_bottom -> two_tone_bikini". Just because the bikini bottom only uses 1 or 2 colors doesn't mean that the entire bikini does!
Updated