The bulk update request #6055 is pending approval.

Reason: There are currently hundreds of images tagged with white_bikini_bottom, o-ring_bikini_bottom, etc. which are all missing the bikini_bottom tag itself! It's fairly obvious that these tags are referring to a bikini bottom within the post. Other tag implications, such as "bikini_bottom -> bottomwear" should be self-explanatory as well.

I chose not to include bikini_bottom_removed, as the actual piece of clothing may not be visible. Examples include post #3541573, post #3017808 and post #2884174. Whether the tag is used correctly to begin with, and the validity of its existence, should be a topic of another discussion.

post #985708 is the only post to use the tag bead_bikini_bottom. Should the implication "bead_bikini_bottom -> bikini_bottom" be added?

I typed out a bunch of color implications, but there is a limit of 25 implications per BUR. I have created the following BURs as extensions of this one: BUR #6056, BUR #6057 and BUR #6058.

P.S. Somebody should probably make a similar BUR for bikini_top as well.
Lastly, some curiosities to potentially spark new threads:
1. heart_ring is not aliased to heart_ring_(hardware).
2. heart_ring_panties and heart_ring_bra don't imply anything.
3. "o-ring" has a hyphen while "heart_ring" does not.

ichhabs said:

post #985708 is the only post to use the tag bead_bikini_bottom. Should the implication "bead_bikini_bottom -> bikini_bottom" be added?

I’m not sure that’s even a bikini. Looks more like a form of lingerie. It would be utterly useless as swimwear. I’d probably alias it to bead_panties, which seems more likely what those actually are.

1. heart_ring is not aliased to heart_ring_(hardware).

The actual hardware item is in fact called an O-ring, but I think some wires got crossed somewhere and the gasket started getting used for decorative elements on clothing. Generally, a decorative clothing element doesn’t count as "hardware" in any sense, which is what the tag implies. Also, these seem to be mostly metal rings, while the actual hardware O-ring is made of rubber and used as a seal. We might want to get rid of that entirely, or change the name.

In any case, a "heart ring" is not a real hardware component, as far as I can tell. I don’t think the suffix is needed.

3. "o-ring" has a hyphen while "heart_ring" does not.

Again, "O-ring" is the technically correct name for the hardware component, regardless of whether or not the tag itself is being used correctly. "Heart ring" is not a real hardware component, so I don’t think it needs to follow that format. For how the tag is used, "heart ring" without a hyphen is grammatically correct. Also, generally speaking, words whose shape is described with a single letter such as "O-ring" always get a hyphen. Think T-shirt, A-frame, and so on.

scaliespe said:
The actual hardware item is in fact called an O-ring, but I think some wires got crossed somewhere and the gasket started getting used for decorative elements on clothing. Generally, a decorative clothing element doesn’t count as "hardware" in any sense, which is what the tag implies. Also, these seem to be mostly metal rings, while the actual hardware O-ring is made of rubber and used as a seal. We might want to get rid of that entirely, or change the name.

In any case, a "heart ring" is not a real hardware component, as far as I can tell. I don’t think the suffix is needed.

Again, "O-ring" is the technically correct name for the hardware component, regardless of whether or not the tag itself is being used correctly. "Heart ring" is not a real hardware component, so I don’t think it needs to follow that format. For how the tag is used, "heart ring" without a hyphen is grammatically correct. Also, generally speaking, words whose shape is described with a single letter such as "O-ring" always get a hyphen. Think T-shirt, A-frame, and so on.

There is a whole category of ring_(hardware) tags, including square_ring_(hardware). (Yeah I just now found square_ring_bikini_bottom.) This serves to differentiate/disambiguate from the ring_(jewelry) tag. As such, the hardware suffix makes sense for ring shapes that might be used as jewelry.

Added "implicate square_ring_bikini_bottom -> bikini_bottom"
Added "implicate square_ring_bikini_bottom -> square_ring_bikini"
Added "implicate square_ring_bikini -> square_ring_swimwear"

Removed "implicate heart_ring_bikini -> heart_ring_(hardware)".
Added "implicate heart_ring_bikini -> heart_ring_swimwear".

The implications "heart_ring_swimwear -> heart_ring_(hardware)", "o-ring_swimwear -> o-ring", "square_ring_swimwear -> square_ring_(hardware)", etc. shall be subject of their own discussion.

Added "implicate holding_bikini_bottom -> holding_clothing"