The bulk update request #6023 has been rejected.

create implication sleep_shitting (0) -> pooping (7924)
create implication sleep_shitting (0) -> feces (14969)
create implication sleep_shitting (0) -> scat (0)
create implication sleep_shitting (0) -> sleeping (37215)

Reason: It's a niche tag, but it would be nice to have these implications. I don't see why not.

EDIT: The bulk update request #6023 (forum #383912) has been rejected by @scaliespe.

this should be aliased to sleep pooping to line up with the pattern of shitting -> pooping aliases we already have.

scat should not be implied as that's only supposed to be applied when feces is used in a sexual manner (scat and watersports are some of the most misused tags on this whole site).

also pooping already implies feces so there's no need for sleep pooping to.

pleaseletmein said:
also pooping already implies feces so there's no need for sleep pooping to.

No, it doesn't, and the pooping wiki explicitly mentions why:

This doesn't automatically mean feces will be visible — e.g. a character may be shown on a toilet, with "plop" and farting sound effects to indicate they're defecating, without showing any feces. Please be sure to use the feces tag only when it is visible.

I'm not entirely sure if it's possible to depict sleep_pooping without showing feces though? At best, if there was fart sounds/fumes and the character was dreaming about sitting on a toilet, maybe it could count as sleep_pooping? I would rather error on the side of caution and have sleep_pooping NOT imply feces, just in case.

also scat already implies feces, so no need for that to be there

cutefox123 said:
also scat already implies feces, so no need for that to be there

pleaseletmein said:
scat should not be implied as that's only supposed to be applied when feces is used in a sexual manner (scat and watersports are some of the most misused tags on this whole site).

crocogator said:
No, it doesn't, and the pooping wiki explicitly mentions why:

I'm not entirely sure if it's possible to depict sleep_pooping without showing feces though? At best, if there was fart sounds/fumes and the character was dreaming about sitting on a toilet, maybe it could count as sleep_pooping? I would rather error on the side of caution and have sleep_pooping NOT imply feces, just in case.

good point, forgot about that.

so the BUR should really be:

create alias sleep_shitting -> sleep_pooping
create implication sleep_pooping -> sleeping
create implication sleep_pooping -> pooping

The bulk update request #7714 is active.

create alias sleep_shitting (0) -> sleep_pooping (29)
create implication sleep_pooping (29) -> sleeping (37215)
create implication sleep_pooping (29) -> pooping (7924)
create alias pooping_in_sleep (1) -> sleep_pooping (29)

Reason: Amended BUR

also scat is now aliased so the above BUR would fail

topic #42528 has sleep_shitting -> pooping_in_sleep, but that's not a great destination since that's the only populated tag with the *_in_sleep format

EDIT: The bulk update request #7714 (forum #402010) has been approved by @scaliespe.

bump

The bulk update request #6023 (forum #383912) has been rejected by @scaliespe.

The bulk update request #7714 (forum #402010) has been approved by @scaliespe.