The bulk update request #5767 is active.

create implication forehead_gem (7448) -> gem (29757)
create implication chest_gem (825) -> gem (29757)
create implication tail_gem (65) -> gem (29757)
create alias navel_gem (3) -> belly_gem (160)
create implication belly_gem (160) -> gem (29757)

Reason: Forehead gems are gems, chest gems are gems, etc. I think belly_gem is a better name than navel_gem, but what do you guys think? I can remove that line if needed.

There's also a head_gem tag which is currently all forehead gems. Maaaybe we alias head_gem -> forehead_gem?

EDIT: The bulk update request #5767 (forum #380502) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #5853 is active.

create implication white_gem (12) -> gem (29757)
create implication grey_gem (0) -> gem (29757)
create implication black_gem (5) -> gem (29757)
create implication brown_gem (1) -> gem (29757)
create implication red_gem (653) -> gem (29757)
create implication orange_gem (48) -> gem (29757)
create implication yellow_gem (388) -> gem (29757)
create implication green_gem (191) -> gem (29757)
create implication teal_gem (5) -> gem (29757)
create implication blue_gem (322) -> gem (29757)
create implication purple_gem (198) -> gem (29757)
create implication pink_gem (61) -> gem (29757)
create implication tan_gem (1) -> gem (29757)

Reason: This made me notice gem colors also do not imply gem! Adding this BUR to this thread because it is gem-related 👉👈

EDIT: The bulk update request #5853 (forum #381553) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #5859 is pending approval.

create implication collar_gem (0) -> gem (29757)
create implication collar_gem (0) -> collar (263342)
create implication collar_gem (0) -> jewelry (246694)

Reason: this too? i've seen gems on collars every so often (albeit untagged since there wasn't a tag for it)

hypabeast_ad said:
The bulk update request #5859 is pending approval.

create implication collar_gem (0) -> gem (29757)
create implication collar_gem (0) -> collar (263342)
create implication collar_gem (0) -> jewelry (246694)

Reason: this too? i've seen gems on collars every so often (albeit untagged since there wasn't a tag for it)

jewel collar has had limited use for that, so you could add an alias.

pleaseletmein said:
jewel collar has had limited use for that, so you could add an alias.

depicting a collar with gems, jewelry and/or precious metals (like gold and silver)

The bulk update request #5860 is pending approval.

create implication collar_gem (0) -> jewel_collar (70)

Reason: i will add an implication, though.

The bulk update request #6192 is pending approval.

create implication pink_quartz_(gem) (36) -> pink_gem (61)
create implication amethyst_(gem) (518) -> purple_gem (198)

Reason: The gem wiki has a bunch of gem names listed next to a color.

However, I’m unsure some gems should imply a color, such as emerald, because of the chaos emeralds from Sonic having multiple colors.

post #3950587

The bulk update request #5767 (forum #380502) has been approved by @slyroon.

dimoretpinel said:
The bulk update request #6192 is pending approval.

create implication pink_quartz_(gem) (36) -> pink_gem (61)
create implication amethyst_(gem) (518) -> purple_gem (198)

Reason: The gem wiki has a bunch of gem names listed next to a color.

However, I’m unsure some gems should imply a color, such as emerald, because of the chaos emeralds from Sonic having multiple colors.

post #3950587

Pink quartz (or rose quartz more accurately) is always pink because it's just the name for quartz that is pink, so this implication is valid.
Same goes for amethyst -> purple_gem. Amethyst is just what you call quartz when it's purple.
Emeralds are always green irl. I don't think the chaos emeralds are twys as emeralds anyway, right? Could emeralds even be twys?

Sapphires, diamonds, jade, pearl, opal, topaz, onyx and quartz come in more than the stereotypically associated colors, so those shouldn't imply any color tags.

hypabeast_ad said:
depicting a collar with gems, jewelry and/or precious metals (like gold and silver)

This seems like a wiki issue. I don't see why a tag called jewel_collar should include non-jewels

oopsitripped said:
Pink quartz (or rose quartz more accurately) is always pink because it's just the name for quartz that is pink, so this implication is valid.
Same goes for amethyst -> purple_gem. Amethyst is just what you call quartz when it's purple.

Should pink_quartz_(gem) and amethyst_(gem) imply quartz?

I edited BUR #6192 to add
amethyst gem -> purple gem

dimoretpinel said:
Should pink_quartz_(gem) and amethyst_(gem) imply quartz?

Idk, would that be helpful to anyone? I'd say implying pink quartz makes sense since it's in the name, but I'm not sure about amethyst. Tagging rock "taxonomy" would get stupid pretty fast. Like, technically a ruby is just a red/pink saphire, but that implication would cause more confusion than anything.

bump for the <color>_gem bur

The bulk update request #5853 (forum #381553) has been approved by @slyroon.